How many times are people going to use SIZE as a reason somebody will win/lose?

[STILL_DETOX]

this is boxing, not wrestling

[Benncollinsaad]

Depends what division we are talking about. In lighter division, no. Middle divisions, sometimes. Heavier divisions, yes.

[PowerpuG]

to answer the poll would you rather fight ivan calderon or vitali klitschko?

[STILL_DETOX]

to answer the poll would you rather fight ivan calderon or vitali klitschko?

vitali klitschko

[S A M U R A I]

to answer the poll would you rather fight ivan calderon or vitali klitschko?

That's a silly question if I've ever heard one. When you have two fighters at / near the same weight class size becomes pretty much irrelevant. Skills and speed become the important factors. No fighter on earth has a choice to fight either Calderon or Klitschko. Oh, hang on... Paul Williams might be the only one who could do it.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Benncollinsaad]

That's a silly question if I've ever heard one. When you have two fighters at / near the same weight class size becomes pretty much irrelevant. Skills and speed become the important factors. No fighter on earth has a choice to fight either Calderon or Klitschko. Oh, hang on... Paul Williams might be the only one who could do it.

He'd lose to both.

[Pullcounter]

this is boxing, not wrestling

dont' be assinine. cotto, pac and roach all say cotto has the size advantage.

cotto is betting on his size advantage to give him the fight.

/thread

[zeidrich]

i dunno but the most important for me is height and reach, if the weight is not that far way from each other, its fine.