Is pacquiao really an atg or #4# fighter

[baracuda]

Yeah but how can you be called a champ when you move up in weight class and pick the weakest out of the champions when you could it fought the top dog in the division.

do you know what lineal means?....lol

[krazyx19]

And i mean David Diaz

Diaz was a tune-up at LW. Is it Pac's fault DLH offered him a fight?

[loui_ludwig]

Yeah but how can you be called a champ when you move up in weight class and pick the weakest out of the champions when you could it fought the top dog in the division.

At least Pac beat the champions who beat the champions for the ABC/Ring belts. You can't say that for Cotto, he beat nobodies for the vacant WBO.

[shadeyfizzle]

Pacquiao has captured six world titles in different weight classes:

The lower weights fought a bunch of nobodys

At 125 lbs he got a draw Marquez
At 130 lbs he fought Maquez again which in many peoples eyes he lost that one.
At 135 lbs he beats up David Diaz a guy who just doesn't have skills and vacates it.
At 140 lbs moves up after beating Diaz and fights Hatton beats Hatton. Now his moving up again to fight Cotto at 145 lbs to go for his 7 world title. My question to this is. Is Manny Really all that great when he has fought alot of guys that aren't that skill. The only good fighters his fought is Morales, Barrera, Marquez and DHL which he fought at the end of his career. He really has not defended his world titles like a real champion does and yet people in here say his ATG which his not. You can't be called ATG or #4# when you beat fighters like Diaz and Hatton. What do you think? Is he an ATG #4# or not?

Are you smoking crack???

at 126 lbs he KO'd Marco antonio barrera who was #2 p4p at the time.
gets a draw against JMM who was #7 p4p at the time.

at 130 he KO'd Morales who fell from #2 p4p to #4 after losing to Raheem at LIGHTWEIGHT
he beats Barrera again who was still #6 p4p at the time.
he beats JMM for the belt who was ranked #3 p4p

at 135 he went from #2 p4p to #1 by default because of Mayweather's retirement

at 140 he KO's Hatton in 2 who was ranked #9 p4p.

[Boricua78]

do you know what lineal means?....lol

Yes i do, but what saying is David Diaz wasn't one and Hatton is overrated. Marquez beat him and he got a decision that it should of went to Marquez.

[loui_ludwig]

And i mean David Diaz

He might be the weakest of the champs but was ranked top 3, can't say that about Jennings.

[shadeyfizzle]

Yes i do, but what saying is David Diaz wasn't one and Hatton is overrated. Marquez beat him and he got a decision that it should of went to Marquez.

and Barrera beat Marquez and won the belt through a decision that should have went to Barrera. What's your point??? A win is a win unless it's outright robbery like Casamayor Santa Cruz or Malignaggi Diaz

[Boricua78]

At least Pac beat the champions who beat the champions for the ABC/Ring belts. You can't say that for Cotto, he beat nobodies for the vacant WBO.

But fights the best to defend his title.

[baracuda]

Yes i do, but what saying is David Diaz wasn't one and Hatton is overrated. Marquez beat him and he got a decision that it should of went to Marquez.

so if you do then why this?.jmm got his ass put down to deserve a win.....has cotto been a lineal champ?......

[loui_ludwig]

Yes i do, but what saying is David Diaz wasn't one and Hatton is overrated. Marquez beat him and he got a decision that it should of went to Marquez.

Hatton is overrated now that Pac is facing Cotto. Pac made quick work of Hatton.

As far as JMM fight, like most media and fans say that it was a closed fight that could have gone either way. You might have scored it for JMM but he didn't clearly beat him.