Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Step aside Joshua, Fury vs Usyk is the fan favorite

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Agreed, Joshua needs to step aside and let the big dawgs have it out.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
      No ones asking for Usyk vs Fury in terms of majority ,they are asking for Fury vs Whyte though if we’re going by do what the fans want there you go .
      The only people interested in Whyte are matchroom casuals.

      Any real boxing fan knows that Whyte is a bum and cannon-fodder for the Gypsy King.

      Fury vs Usyk is the only fight that matters.
      15round 15round likes this.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by denium View Post

        The only people interested in Whyte are matchroom casuals.

        Any real boxing fan knows that Whyte is a bum and cannon-fodder for the Gypsy King.

        Fury vs Usyk is the only fight that matters.
        https://********/TlDzD3S42Rc
        The link is a few hours ago of Hearn laughing at the notion of step aside money . Even if posters view that they still will insist Usyk is fighting Fury because these aren’t normally people on here .

        You guys need to stop drinking . The fight isn’t,possible and you know as well as I do Furys toughest fight is the one he avoided so far ,AJ . I would give Whyte a relatively good chance at knocking out Fury . It’s about a 65/35 split on odds and I’ve seen far worse upsets happen to better fighters . And odds don’t mean much if a fighter has the best night ever and or the other guy makes critical mistakes .

        Fury protectionism on here has reached an all time high ,you literally want him to not fight top guys and would rather him call fake fights knowing they aren’t happening ?
        Last edited by REDEEMER; 12-09-2021, 10:37 PM.

        Comment


        • #14
          Anybody frustrated that we're not getting Fury-Usyk next should be blaming Usyk, not Joshua.

          Usyk was mandatory with a guaranteed title shot. No rematch clause.

          Usyk chose to voluntarily sell a rematch clause to Joshua because he wasn't confident he'd win. Can't get mad at Joshua for demanding what he paid for.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
            Anybody frustrated that we're not getting Fury-Usyk next should be blaming Usyk, not Joshua.

            Usyk was mandatory with a guaranteed title shot. No rematch clause.

            Usyk chose to voluntarily sell a rematch clause to Joshua because he wasn't confident he'd win. Can't get mad at Joshua for demanding what he paid for.
            What are you talking about its Joshua that had the rematch clause and you ever thought that by signing a rematch clause was the only way to make AJ fight him.
            I thought you were smarter than that.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by BLASTER1 View Post
              What are you talking about its Joshua that had the rematch clause and you ever thought that by signing a rematch clause was the only way to make AJ fight him. I thought you were smarter than that.
              Usyk as mandatory challenger was guaranteed a title shot with NO REMATCH CLAUSE.

              Usyk, because he wasn't confident he was going to win, chose to voluntary SELL a rematch clause to Joshua.

              You can't get mad at Joshua for wanting what he paid for.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post

                Usyk as mandatory challenger was guaranteed a title shot with NO REMATCH CLAUSE.

                Usyk, because he wasn't confident he was going to win, chose to voluntary SELL a rematch clause to Joshua.

                You can't get mad at Joshua for wanting what he paid for.
                Maybe he just want to siphern the golden duck.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by 15round View Post
                  Joshua needs to step aside and let winners fight winners. Fury vs Usyk needs to happen. Joshua needs to fight Wilder. Both have two losses in the last few years and need to settle who is best between them. Winners of these fights and losers fight each other. Forget the titles they don't mean squat anymore. Fans don't remember titles or give a blip about them. Man up heavyweights and make it happen.
                  You say man up heavyweights but with the same breath tell Joshua to swerve a rematch. He was embarrassed in that fight and no amount of money should sway him from that challenge. Noone wanted to see Fury vs WILDER 3 when the Undisputed fight between AJ and Fury had been made but i understand Wilder for pursuing the fight. Let AJ do the same. The titles mean nothing to you perhaps in your comfy chair

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post

                    Usyk as mandatory challenger was guaranteed a title shot with NO REMATCH CLAUSE.

                    Usyk, because he wasn't confident he was going to win, chose to voluntary SELL a rematch clause to Joshua.

                    You can't get mad at Joshua for wanting what he paid for.
                    The rematch clause was for only if AJ lost ,they didn’t sell any rematch ? Usyk didn’t sell anything he’s in no position to . Just because he was the mandatory doesn’t mean he didn’t have to sign for 2 fights .


                    (e) The designation of a Mandatory Challenger creates an obligation on behalf of the Champion to defend against the designated Mandatory Challenger as a condition to the Champion’s retention of the title. This obligation may be subject to modification or extension by the Championship Committee for good cause, such as (but not limited to) participation by the Champion in a unification bout or a unification tournament on such terms and conditions as the Championship Committee approves. The designation of Mandatory Challenger does not create rights in the Challenger, and may be subject to such conditions, modification, or extension as the Championship Committee determines .


                    Usyks feelings confident or not have nothing to do with the contract stipulations ,what crazy idea did you pull that one out of ?
                    Citizen Koba Citizen Koba likes this.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                      The rematch clause was for only if AJ lost ,they didn’t sell any rematch ? Usyk didn’t sell anything he’s in no position to . Just because he was the mandatory doesn’t mean he didn’t have to sign for 2 fights .
                      Actually, that's exactly what it means. Usyk had a mandated title shot with no rematch clause. There was no way to force a rematch clause on him. However, fighters in that position often choose to hedge their bets by agreeing to voluntarily sell a rematch clause to make some extra money, even though it totally ****s them if they end up winning the first fight. He wasn't confident he'd win the first fight, so he wanted the free money from selling a rematch clause. Happens all the time. Fury did the same thing when he fought Klitschko.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP