Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos - LIVE BoxingScene Scorecard

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I scored the fight a draw, but I can see how Kamboosa won. Teo may need a new trainer and corner. They gave him no real instructions throughout the fight, and they kept telling their fighter he was winning rounds when he wasn't.

    Comment


    • #32
      Great fight glad Kambosos won he’s a class act. As for Teo he’s the new Adrian Broner saying he won the fight

      Comment


      • #33
        Why are people on twitter talking about Kambosos vs Haney, instead of Kambosos vs Lomachenko? I personally don't want to see either because Kambosos isn't very good, and we just learned neither is Lopez, neither was Lomachenko (I admit it, I was wrong), and neither is Haney who did worse vs an old Linares than Lomachenko, who turned out to be overrated, did vs a prime Linares. But at least Lomachenko is accomplished in the division. Lomachenko at least was former #1 on the pound-for-pound, which is a meaningless list fake journalists use to market the sport, but I'm just saying. He at least is better than Haney, and more accomplished. Why in the world would Haney get a shot at the belts before Lomachenko?

        Again, I'm not against it. Lomachenko should be fighting better opponents than Kambosos in the first place, so let Haney fight Kambosos while Lomachenko fights an actual good opponent. I'm just saying, it doesn't make any sense, plus judging by Lomachenko's recent opposition, he will cherry pick another opponent worse than Kambosos, not one better.

        This sport should be illegal. Not because it's too dangerous, but because it's filled with too much ******ity to the point it is detrimental to humanity. It should at least have a warning like tobacco, except instead of a warning about nicotine causing cancer, it should say "this sport is filled with so much ******ity and fakery, extended exposure to it may fry your brain." At least that way, people watching it, especially young people, are allowed informed consent when they watch it. Whereas a lot of us started watching it without knowing exactly what it was, and got hooked without any informed consent about what we were getting hooked on. That just seems wrong.
        Last edited by Boxing Logic; 11-28-2021, 12:15 AM.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Rigpig View Post
          Great fight glad Kambosos won he’s a class act. As for Teo he’s the new Adrian Broner saying he won the fight
          Yes...the new AB...ahahahhahahaa

          Comment


          • #35
            Hell of a fight. The Right guy won
            Last edited by Senor_frogs; 11-28-2021, 12:43 AM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by DClefthook View Post

              Yes...the new AB...ahahahhahahaa
              The way he takes "punches" with his head up in the air, not reactive, the same way AJ does, is super amateurish, and the reason I no longer consider Loma a top fighter. Yes Loma hit him clean a lot in the second half of their fight, but the fighter I thought Loma was would be hitting fighters clean like that, and that consistently, who have A+ defense. For a fighter with awful defense like Teofimo, Loma should have been hitting him like Pacquiao vs Margarito, 100 punches per round, landing 50 of them, except Loma's power relative to Teofimo's punch resistance is way better than Pacquiao's relative to Margarito's.

              Before anyone argues about that, please make sure you understand what I'm saying. I'm not saying Loma's power is better than Pacquiao's in general, I am saying relative to the punch resistance of the respective opponents. Margarito at 152, vs Pacquiao who didn't knock out many guys at 147, is way more durable than Teofimo is vs Lomachenko at 135, where Lomachenko has looked more powerful than he did at 126 and 130 (because Boxing is fake, ridiculous, and inconsistent, but let's no go there).

              I mean, Kambosos did more damage vs Lopez than Lomachenko did. That says it all. Lomachenko is overrated. Teofimo has reminded me of Broner in the past. He has some tools to be very good but not the defense or fight IQ. With that said, Broner was pretty good at 135, and dangerous. Teofimo is better than Broner at 135, I think. He's more fluid and balanced. But the fight IQ and the defense are not there. Broner probably had better defense at 135. Really it depends what fight. Broner at his best at 135 was quite good. At his worst he was much worse than the Teofimo we saw tonight. But I'd have to go back and remember which fights of his were at lightweight and which weren't.

              I just really think Lomachenko ruined his reputation with the performance vs Teofimo. People said Lomachenko was scared of the power, but we saw tonight, Teofimo is not really a puncher. He is more like Canelo at 154, if that, in terms of power. Less, actually. He knocked out some C level guys but that's it. When Lomachenko hit Teofimo, it seemed like he hurt Teofimo more, with a single punch, than Teofimo hurt him. It's just that Teofimo fought through it, while Lomachenko wouldn't. So Lomachenko didn't just hurt his reputation as far as talent, he hurt his reputation as far as toughness in the ring as well. I'm not saying I would be any tougher, quite the opposite, but by the standards of professional boxers Lomachenko showed both less ability, and less toughness, competitiveness, championship mettle, and will to win, than I thought he had.

              Comment


              • #37
                I will say, I noticed Lomachenko vs Campbell, he learned as the fight went on to stick in the pocket past the initial exchange, and end the exchanges. Then vs Lopez, he evolved a little more. And then vs Nakatani, he seemed to put it all together. Maybe the next WWE narrative they're going to run with is despite Loma's age and pro success, he still has under 20 pro fights, so he's still learning the pro style in some ways, and we haven't seen the best of him yet, and all that bs. Hey, it would be fun to watch an improved Loma, since he was already pretty entertaining. Boxing has already completely jumped the shark in the last 10 years, so why not. Maybe when Loma is 40 years old we can see him move up to welterweight and look the best he's ever looked. By that point, society may be so dumbed down by all this ******* vs conservative psychological manipulation from the WWE political sphere (as opposed to the WWE sports sphere we're talking about right now) that maybe they can even get away with having Loma become the #1 middleweight without having most people question it. And that would be entertaining too. Better than Lomachenko vs Commey, GGG vs Murata, and Andrade, Charlo, and Canelo vs C level performers, that's for sure.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
                  I will say, I noticed Lomachenko vs Campbell, he learned as the fight went on to stick in the pocket past the initial exchange, and end the exchanges. Then vs Lopez, he evolved a little more. And then vs Nakatani, he seemed to put it all together. Maybe the next WWE narrative they're going to run with is despite Loma's age and pro success, he still has under 20 pro fights, so he's still learning the pro style in some ways, and we haven't seen the best of him yet, and all that bs. Hey, it would be fun to watch an improved Loma, since he was already pretty entertaining. Boxing has already completely jumped the shark in the last 10 years, so why not. Maybe when Loma is 40 years old we can see him move up to welterweight and look the best he's ever looked. By that point, society may be so dumbed down by all this ******* vs conservative psychological manipulation from the WWE political sphere (as opposed to the WWE sports sphere we're talking about right now) that maybe they can even get away with having Loma become the #1 middleweight without having most people question it. And that would be entertaining too. Better than Lomachenko vs Commey, GGG vs Murata, and Andrade, Charlo, and Canelo vs C level performers, that's for sure.
                  Why are you so butt hurt about Loma on a Lopez-Kembosos punch stats thread. Tf is wrong with you?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
                    Why are people on twitter talking about Kambosos vs Haney, instead of Kambosos vs Lomachenko?
                    Because Kambosos said he wants Haney.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      This is exactly how I scored the fight: 115-111. I can't see it any other way. That judge who gave it to Lopez ... I'd check his bank account tonight. Never ceases to amaze me how easy it is to get these judges to score it for one fighter. "You want pay day? You want pay day?"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP