Makabu is less than half as much a underdog as Porter,same odds as Usyk/AJ & Fury/Wilder,closest odds since ggg,please help does not compute how hes a cherrypick & not them
Makabu is less than half as much a underdog as Porter,same odds as Usyk/AJ & Fury/Wilder,closest odds since ggg,please help does not compute how hes a cherrypick & not them
please explain, speak now or forever hold your peace
Makabus only +300 v Canelo,while Porter is a 10/1 dog v Bud
It is now officially official that Makabu is less of a underdog than anyone below CW would be v Canelo(exactly as I told you he would be)
Watch 90% of nsb ride bud’s dong and claim he’s p4p#1 if he beats a 34yr old Shawn Porter on a 15 month layoff who was already beaten by Brook, Spence and Thurman.
Watch 90% of nsb ride bud’s dong and claim he’s p4p#1 if he beats a 34yr old Shawn Porter on a 15 month layoff who was already beaten by Brook, Spence and Thurman.
I will rate the win highly if Bud stops Porter or schools him,but I am sensible & honest,I don't move goalposts
(even though I consider Canelo v Makabu a better win as the odds confirm (odds don't lie 99.9% of the time,when it comes to how dangerous a fight is on paper,it isn't a coincidence Usyk/AJ odds told us there might be an upset even if we already knew that)
You could wait until the day of the fight when the odds settle before making this for an equal comparison.
Even if you count it v opening lines in those fights,Makabu still is less of a dog/or no worse than equal,& when Usyk faced Breidis he was twice as big of a favorite
Interesting how the definition of “cherry-pick” evolves. For example Danny Garcia fighting Rod Salka, a light weight contender with multiple loses moving up a division to fight Garcia, was a cherry pick.
now Canelo moving up and down divisions to fight champions in those divisions is considered “cherry-picking”
I guess haters have to find a way to spin it in their favor.
Comment