Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford-Shawn Porter: Stats & Stakes

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

By Cliff Rold - With the bulk of who mattered at welterweight over the last few years falling under the PBC umbrella, Terence Crawford has been an island unto himself. Over five fights at welterweight, Crawford has made a living but top competition hasn't been there. No matter who one finds most culpable, it's hard not to see the last three years as a significant waste of prime.
[Click Here To Read More]

[OGBIGSACK]

I blame pbc. they have tried to freeze crawford out. pbc refuses to work with other promoters/networks. it's true check the stats. another thing is the welterweights at pbc are inactive for long stretches of time. who cares if you got most of the fighters in a weight class if they're not fighting!

[harry-greb]

Bud on points is 10/11. I'll take that bet.

[FLY TY]

I blame pbc. they have tried to freeze crawford out. pbc refuses to work with other promoters/networks. it's true check the stats. another thing is the welterweights at pbc are inactive for long stretches of time. who cares if you got most of the fighters in a weight class if they're not fighting!

Stop...Terence has been out the ring for over a year. Before that, he was fighting twice a year, just like the PBC guys. Check the stats and stop parroting misinformation.

[A.B Counterhooks]

I really hope porter pressure can overwhelm bud, we all know who better technically speaking in this fight, looking forward for a great scrap

[edgarg]

Cliff. No doubt Porter always brings a great fight. But you say that when the opposition is better he rises to the occasion, implying that he wins. . You semi protected your assertions by not qualifying "rises"......because, when he fought both Thurman and Brook, their opposition was better =yet he did not win the decisions.

[edgarg]

Why is my post not amongst the 4 others,. The tag still says "4" comments.It should be "5"...plus this one making 6 in all. simple arith.

Your new format, as I said last year, is the worst I've come across. Your previous set uo worked like a good watch, why did you change it. Change is not always better, and this is a good example.

It's impossible for a computer incompetent , like myself to actually find anything he wants. This was not the case with your previous set up. GO BACK.

[edgarg]

Apologies Cliff. I misread Porter for Crawford. Deep apologies.

[wileyhemi]

Why is my post not amongst the 4 others,. The tag still says "4" comments.It should be "5"...plus this one making 6 in all. simple arith.

Your new format, as I said last year, is the worst I've come across. Your previous set uo worked like a good watch, why did you change it. Change is not always better, and this is a good example.

It's impossible for a computer incompetent , like myself to actually find anything he wants. This was not the case with your previous set up. GO BACK.

There's no going back … get with it … just saying

[Andre Agoncillo]

Woohoooo no one to fight next! Crawford best Welter ever.