Will Artur Beterbiev vs Marcus Browne has a rehydration clause?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigDramaShow!
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2019
    • 3265
    • 1,185
    • 321
    • 23,455

    #1

    Will Artur Beterbiev vs Marcus Browne has a rehydration clause?

    *have

    As Beterbiev holds the IBF belt and IBF has a riule of same day weigh in / rehydration clause in title defenses.

    Will the haters suggest Beterbiev vacate and drop the IBF belt to give Browne a fair shake?

    I know IBF gave the option to remove the clause if it’s a unification fight. But browne has no belts so...
    Last edited by BigDramaShow!; 11-18-2021, 01:39 AM.
  • TreyShaw
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2021
    • 2277
    • 779
    • 800
    • 0

    #2
    It only counts when it’s Canelo

    Comment

    • BigDramaShow!
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2019
      • 3265
      • 1,185
      • 321
      • 23,455

      #3
      Originally posted by TreyShaw
      It only counts when it’s Canelo
      Facts. Even Golovkin vs Szeremeta had a rehydration clause

      Comment

      • iNixus
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2014
        • 602
        • 14
        • 5
        • 15,303

        #4
        Only a wbc tittle fight IBF is not in play (if my memory serve me right) however if IBF was in play there is no rehydration since he had WBC belt as well

        Comment

        • ICEMAN JOHN SCULLY
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 6634
          • 785
          • 52
          • 19,334

          #5
          Rehydration clauses ARE A JOKE

          Comment

          • _Rexy_
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2018
            • 27929
            • 6,140
            • 3,585
            • 358,040

            #6
            Jesus Christ, learn the ****ing rules of the sport before you make twenty threads a day.


            The IBF has a hydration clause. Because this is a unification fight, there is no hydration clause.

            Comment

            • Howitzer78
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2021
              • 106
              • 78
              • 27
              • 0

              #7
              This thread is a little confusing.

              Comment

              • BigDramaShow!
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2019
                • 3265
                • 1,185
                • 321
                • 23,455

                #8
                Originally posted by _Rexy_
                Jesus Christ, learn the ****ing rules of the sport before you make twenty threads a day.


                The IBF has a hydration clause. Because this is a unification fight, there is no hydration clause.
                Unification fight? Are you that ******? Jesus christ.

                How can it be a unification when Beterbiev has both belts and Browne has none?

                That would make the fight a title defense and not a unification

                God, you're dumb as fçk. You don't know shyte about boxing

                Comment

                • _Rexy_
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2018
                  • 27929
                  • 6,140
                  • 3,585
                  • 358,040

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BigDramaShow!

                  Unification fight? Are you that ******? Jesus christ.

                  How can it be a unification when Beterbiev has both belts and Browne has none?

                  That would make the fight a title defense and not a unification

                  God, you're dumb as fçk. You don't know shyte about boxing
                  Because it’s held under unification rules you dumb ****. Making it officially a unification bout. It doesn’t matter who has what. He’s defending his unified title.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP