p4p list is mythical same as the atg list....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baracuda
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 10779
    • 259
    • 569
    • 11,470

    #11
    Originally posted by catalinul
    It's based more on recent results.
    which is what you call accomplisment...

    Comment

    • baracuda
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 10779
      • 259
      • 569
      • 11,470

      #12
      Originally posted by british_fan
      mythical?
      no,it exsists
      and the p4p list does not huh?....

      Comment

      • catalinul
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 6581
        • 115
        • 49
        • 13,580

        #13
        Originally posted by baracuda
        which is what you call accomplisment...
        rectn accomplishmnets.

        Comment

        • Taino79
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 379
          • 14
          • 20
          • 7,083

          #14
          Originally posted by mangler
          All this p4p and ATG **** is gettin played out. Just watch the fuckin fights.
          Well said, agree 100%, by the way how do you see the current P4P list by Ring Magazine? with all this unactive boxers on it. Just curious.

          Comment

          • baracuda
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 10779
            • 259
            • 569
            • 11,470

            #15
            Originally posted by catalinul
            rectn accomplishmnets.
            lol....ok....p4p=recent accomplishments atg=past accomplishment....fair enough?....

            Comment

            • The_Demon
              Big dog
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 13604
              • 1,354
              • 888
              • 22,971

              #16
              Originally posted by baracuda
              and the p4p list does not huh?....
              ye,believe it or not that exists too

              Comment

              • baracuda
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 10779
                • 259
                • 569
                • 11,470

                #17
                Originally posted by Taino79
                Well said, agree 100%, by the way how do you see the current P4P list by Ring Magazine? with all this unactive boxers on it. Just curious.
                i think it's ok...just dont like caballero being there but oh well(ive only seen couple of his fights which might not be enough for me to judge the guy)......

                i think the inactive ones should be taken out but i think you have to be inactive for a whole year to be out,correct me if im wrong......

                Comment

                • baracuda
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 10779
                  • 259
                  • 569
                  • 11,470

                  #18
                  Originally posted by british_fan
                  ye,believe it or not that exists too
                  so they both exist.......so why is the other one a mythical but not the other again?....

                  Comment

                  • baracuda
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10779
                    • 259
                    • 569
                    • 11,470

                    #19
                    both mythical.....case closed...lol

                    Comment

                    • Taino79
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 379
                      • 14
                      • 20
                      • 7,083

                      #20
                      Originally posted by baracuda
                      i think it's ok...just dont like caballero being there but oh well(ive only seen couple of his fights which might not be enough for me to judge the guy)......

                      i think the inactive ones should be taken out but i think you have to be inactive for a whole year to be out,correct me if im wrong......
                      I do belive that as well, but here is my opinion, Hopkins in Oct will be 1yr with out a fight, Mosley will be almost a year by the time he fights Clottey, Israel Vazquez haven't fight sinse March '08 & Marquez has only won 1 out of the last 3, this guys are all good boxer and I like them all but they are not fighting so how is it that they are still so hightly ranked when there are a lot of other good fighters doing what they are supose too and not getting any credit, again this is my opinion what do you think?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP