Its now official, Ennis ranks above Crawford p4p!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kushking
    Osiris the pssy vampire
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 9520
    • 891
    • 2,019
    • 337,046

    #1

    Its now official, Ennis ranks above Crawford p4p!

    Before Bud fans react,

    aye test doe! Isn't that what y'all said about justifying Crawford as #1 all these years?

    Then how can you not consider Boots above Crawford?After all he kod Breadmans boyeee in 1 rd,& Lipinets in 6,hes steamrolling mfers so how is this different than Crawford again?
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #2
    If he unifies the division you might have a case.

    Comment

    • kushking
      Osiris the pssy vampire
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 9520
      • 891
      • 2,019
      • 337,046

      #3
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
      If he unifies the division you might have a case.
      Bud unified almost like half a decade ago,& aye test means" resume doesn't count" isn't that what you told us on several occasions?

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #4
        Originally posted by kushking

        Bud unified almost like half a decade ago,& aye test means" resume doesn't count" isn't that what you told us on several occasions?
        I didn't tell you ****. I always place resume as the most important thing when judging a fighter. Boxing history is littered with fighters that looked great against low level opposition and fail when the fight the top of the division. Crawford did fight the top fighters in his division.

        Comment

        • Noelanthony
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2016
          • 8896
          • 948
          • 586
          • 105,165

          #5
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett

          I didn't tell you ****. I always place resume as the most important thing when judging a fighter. Boxing history is littered with fighters that looked great against low level opposition and fail when the fight the top of the division. Crawford did fight the top fighters in his division.
          He fought fighters that had the belts. Thats what you are supposed to do if you want to be undisputed. however, beating fighters like Indongo to unify the division its almost like having a cheat code in a arcade game. If any of the fighters he beat went on to achieve something afterwards you can give Crawford even more props but Indongo was beat and stopped in 2 rounds by Prograis. I just want to see Crawford in a 50/50 fight even a 65/35 . I'm not asking for much. The Shawn Porter fight will at least show me how good Crawford really is even though Porter has lost nearly every top fight he has been in. I respect his dog nevertheless, and will put a bit more respect on Crawford's name if he beats Porter. If he knocks Porter out something no other fighter has been close to achieving then he deserves his flowers

          Comment

          • 1hourRun
            SQUAD-UP!
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2010
            • 20526
            • 2,789
            • 2,336
            • 140,312

            #6
            There is no one that Terence Crawford can beat to validate him. I'm not giving 'Bud' credit for beating Shawn Porter ; I can pretend that 'Showtime' is a good win, but he is not.

            I can pretend that when Crawford schools and KO's Errol Spence jr. that it solidifies Crawford as a great welterweight, but it wont because Errol Spence has been in a car-wreck and had nearly gone legally blind. When 'Bud' had the Manny Pacquiao fight a few months ago, I knew that it was a easy win because the Pacman was shot, so I was not going to give him any credit for beating a geezer.

            Terence Crawford has nothing to prove as far as I'm concern, he is evidently light-years ahead of the competition.

            Comment

            • Noelanthony
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2016
              • 8896
              • 948
              • 586
              • 105,165

              #7
              Originally posted by 1hourRun
              There is no one that Terence Crawford can beat to validate him. I'm not giving 'Bud' credit for beating Shawn Porter ; I can pretend that 'Showtime' is a good win, but he is not.

              I can pretend that when Crawford schools and KO's Errol Spence jr. that it solidifies Crawford as a great welterweight, but it wont because Errol Spence has been in a car-wreck and had nearly gone legally blind. When 'Bud' had the Manny Pacquiao fight a few months ago, I knew that it was a easy win because the Pacman was shot, so I was not going to give him any credit for beating a geezer.

              Terence Crawford has nothing to prove as far as I'm concern, he is evidently light-years ahead of the competition.
              evidently??based on what exactly??

              Comment

              • 1hourRun
                SQUAD-UP!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2010
                • 20526
                • 2,789
                • 2,336
                • 140,312

                #8
                Originally posted by Noelanthony

                evidently??based on what exactly??
                I just explained it. I'm working on gifs, I'll let you boys figure it out.

                Comment

                • Noelanthony
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2016
                  • 8896
                  • 948
                  • 586
                  • 105,165

                  #9
                  Originally posted by 1hourRun

                  I just explained it. I'm working on gifs, I'll let you boys figure it out.
                  Not having to fight Spence, Pacman or Shawn because in your mind he has nothing to prove?

                  Comment

                  • kushking
                    Osiris the pssy vampire
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 9520
                    • 891
                    • 2,019
                    • 337,046

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett

                    I didn't tell you ****. I always place resume as the most important thing when judging a fighter. Boxing history is littered with fighters that looked great against low level opposition and fail when the fight the top of the division. Crawford did fight the top fighters in his division.
                    Crawford waited for a time that jww was awful then unified & dropped the belts immediately to go up to ww to fight bums,which hes been doing til Porter

                    But none of that matters because aye test doe Bud fans say,well til hes been struggling to ko huge underdogs that is, while Boots kos them with ease
                    Last edited by kushking; 10-31-2021, 12:02 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP