Why do people tend to overrate/underrate boxers after one fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BangEM
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2019
    • 7978
    • 681
    • 186
    • 249,537

    #1

    Why do people tend to overrate/underrate boxers after one fight?

    Just seeing Shakur Stevenson's name everywhere because he beat a boxer who isn't a world beater makes me want to throw up even as a Shakur Stevenson fan. Some have even started hyping him up as being as good as Pretty Boy Mayweather and have crowned him the next boxing superstar. All after one fight. However, a week ago - the same people were talking about how boring and overrated he's. So which one is it?

    When he gets beat up - the same people cussing him out last week but hyping him today as the best thing since slice bread would be ones the ones saying he's a hypejob and was never good to begin with. And blame imaginary people for hyping him when they were the ones who did. Can you see the pattern? - same is happening with Fury now. Pump the fffcking brakes!

    I know all sports have recency bias, but boxing has to be the only sport where recency bias is on steroids. I know it's bad in American sports like basketball and American football but American media isn't real media - it's about hot takes and narratives that drive fans into frenzy for ratings. Simply put: American media is about ratings, so it's expected.

    However, boxing is a global sport - people need to pump the brakes and take it slow with the hype. Boxing fans are a tedious bunch.
    Last edited by BangEM; 10-26-2021, 08:26 AM.
  • wlad1111
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 444
    • 24
    • 6
    • 15,204

    #2
    Because people have short memories and they are emotion driven machines more than data driven machines.

    Comment

    • BangEM
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2019
      • 7978
      • 681
      • 186
      • 249,537

      #3
      Originally posted by wlad1111
      Because people have short memories and they are emotion driven machines more than data driven machines.
      On the money!

      Human beings are inherently unstable.

      Comment

      • SugarDeanC*ntly
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Mar 2020
        • 178
        • 64
        • 467
        • 1,010

        #4
        Originally posted by BangEM

        On the money!

        Human beings are inherently unstable.
        Exhibit A: boxing forums

        Comment

        • BangEM
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2019
          • 7978
          • 681
          • 186
          • 249,537

          #5
          Originally posted by SugarDeanC*ntly

          Exhibit A: boxing forums
          You’re right.

          Most of the posters on this forum for example are single digit IQ muppets.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP