Originally posted by denium
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Why Pound-For-Pounds Lists Are All Meaningless
Collapse
-
Rodtang likes this.
- Likes 1
-
Fury is the best of this era but the heavyweight division had been exceptionally weak since the late 90s. Fury is not the best British heavyweight ever, Lewis clearly is. Fury is probably the second. I believe he would have outlasted Bruno but I will tell you this, Bruno had a jab AND a right hand and could actually fight. I suspect fury would have outlasted him but styles make fights and fury in with Bruno is a whole lot different from Otto Wallin.
fury WOULD NOT have beaten Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, bowe, etc etc. He’s the best of this era and the best since Vitali, but…..
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by denium View Post
If AJ actually used his size and strength then perhaps it might have been a different fight? Usyk is also levels above AJ in terms of boxing skill so that makes up for the size disparity.
"A good big man always beats a good small man" is a very famous saying in boxing, I'm assuming you've heard it before?
Leave a comment:
-
I prefer the YouTube videos. Top 10 punchers, top 10 defensive fighters, top 10 whatever. They're fun to watch and easy to avoid arguments over. You could argue for days on socials or forums about your own P4P opinions.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mlac View Post
yeah keep saying size matters when everyone saw in the AJ fight that size doesn't actually matter, but ok pal.
"A good big man always beats a good small man" is a very famous saying in boxing, I'm assuming you've heard it before?
bimhead likes this.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: