Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Why Pound-For-Pounds Lists Are All Meaningless

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BarfyMan362
    replied
    Originally posted by denium View Post
    P4P is a complete load of rubbish, made up so little boxers can feel better about themselves.

    Tyson Fury is the best boxer in the world because nobody from any division can beat him in a fight.
    I can think of a few who can beat him in his own division
    Rodtang Rodtang likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldskoolg
    replied
    Fury is the best of this era but the heavyweight division had been exceptionally weak since the late 90s. Fury is not the best British heavyweight ever, Lewis clearly is. Fury is probably the second. I believe he would have outlasted Bruno but I will tell you this, Bruno had a jab AND a right hand and could actually fight. I suspect fury would have outlasted him but styles make fights and fury in with Bruno is a whole lot different from Otto Wallin.
    fury WOULD NOT have beaten Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, bowe, etc etc. He’s the best of this era and the best since Vitali, but…..

    Leave a comment:


  • mlac
    replied
    Originally posted by Toffee View Post

    What? Two men of equal ability fight and you reckon the smaller guy wins? Countless times?

    Nah. You're wrong. Or just deluded.
    er yer... because thats exactly what i said, please stop quoting me you mong.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toffee
    replied
    Originally posted by mlac View Post

    yeah and the saying has been proven wrong countless times. And no, AJ still loses.
    What? Two men of equal ability fight and you reckon the smaller guy wins? Countless times?

    Nah. You're wrong. Or just deluded.

    Leave a comment:


  • removed
    replied
    Originally posted by mlac View Post

    yeah and the saying has been proven wrong countless times. And no, AJ still loses.
    Like someone just said, size does matter.

    Put Canelo in with Fury and see what happens to him.
    bimhead bimhead likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • gooderz84
    replied
    Originally posted by Toffee View Post

    Let's put Canelo in with AJ then.
    F** it... Canelo Usyk @ 200lbs

    Leave a comment:


  • mlac
    replied
    Originally posted by denium View Post

    If AJ actually used his size and strength then perhaps it might have been a different fight? Usyk is also levels above AJ in terms of boxing skill so that makes up for the size disparity.

    "A good big man always beats a good small man" is a very famous saying in boxing, I'm assuming you've heard it before?
    yeah and the saying has been proven wrong countless times. And no, AJ still loses.

    Leave a comment:


  • gooderz84
    replied
    I prefer the YouTube videos. Top 10 punchers, top 10 defensive fighters, top 10 whatever. They're fun to watch and easy to avoid arguments over. You could argue for days on socials or forums about your own P4P opinions.

    Leave a comment:


  • removed
    replied
    Originally posted by mlac View Post

    yeah keep saying size matters when everyone saw in the AJ fight that size doesn't actually matter, but ok pal.
    If AJ actually used his size and strength then perhaps it might have been a different fight? Usyk is also levels above AJ in terms of boxing skill so that makes up for the size disparity.

    "A good big man always beats a good small man" is a very famous saying in boxing, I'm assuming you've heard it before?
    bimhead bimhead likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toffee
    replied
    Originally posted by mlac View Post

    yeah keep saying size matters when everyone saw in the AJ fight that size doesn't actually matter, but ok pal.
    Let's put Canelo in with AJ then.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP