Comments Thread For: Fury: I'm Happy There's Only U.S. Judges; It's Usually British Ones You Get Robbery Against

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Monty Fisto
    And still...
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2018
    • 3441
    • 1,467
    • 855
    • 22,690

    #21
    Smart comments from Fury. He knows there is nothing to be gained by saying anything different. Fight in the US, praise the US and the impartiality of its judges and they will lap it up. It is actually a belief that they are not impartial that would be the diriving force behind making a comment like this.

    Of course, as we all know, Fury is never bound by the truth.

    Here he says he is a US person, that his home in is Las Vegas.

    He did a recent interview in the UK where he said "Why would I abandon my own country for a bit of money and fame? I would never leave Morecambe. It’s true beauty. If the weather was better, every house here would be a million quid.”

    He says what the listener wants to hear.

    Comment

    • LoadedWraps
      Official NSB POTY 2016
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 24267
      • 1,021
      • 1,468
      • 190,165

      #22
      Judges are a problem in just about every country. The good news is, Fury won't let it get to the judges.

      Comment

      • Sid-Knee
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2015
        • 18249
        • 1,091
        • 731
        • 155,532

        #23
        Originally posted by BZBEE
        USA and Japan are fair countries when it comes to judging boxing matches.

        The rest tend to heavily favor their home fighter, for example UK, Australia, Puerto Rico, Philippines, Argentina, Thailand.

        Long Live the Gypsy King! America loves you
        You'd have to be deranged to think fair judging happens in the US. The US is the hotbed of corruption both historically and today.

        What Fury means by this, is when a British judge goes overseas and judges with a British fighter in the ring, they don't want to appear biased to the British fighter. But what actually ends up happening, is they end up with a card that is far too generous for the home fighter. This is why you get those cards from British refs towards British fighters when travelling.

        Comment

        • Sid-Knee
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 18249
          • 1,091
          • 731
          • 155,532

          #24
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn
          Someone should tag DaNeutral. to tell him his conspiracy theory is not shared by Fury.
          Fury means British judges travelling overseas to judge fights with British fighters involved. They don't want to appear biased to their own fighter, so end up giving a generous card towards the American fighter.

          British judge in the first Wilder fight, the Lewis/Holyfield 1 fight etc etc...

          Comment

          • Sid-Knee
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 18249
            • 1,091
            • 731
            • 155,532

            #25
            Originally posted by Greenfield02
            Fury is not wrong, no one does home cooking like the Brits.... And you might say, there's a ton of bad decisions in the states, and I agree, but there's a difference between a bad decision in a close fight, and complete robberies to help out your home fighter, and that's what the U.K specializes in....
            You're insane. The US is about nothing but corruption. Fury is talking about British judges travelling overseas and not wanting to appear biased to their own fighter, but end up being far too generous for the American. There's been quite a few over the years. But they benefit the American pretty much every time.

            But let me see you justify your comment about robberies over here? Give me these robberies? I'll do likewise if you want? I've got thousands of fights from which to draw from. I know you haven't.

            They don't have close fights in the US. They're all out disgusting. You could literally win 10 rounds over there and still get robbed. You won't find that over here.

            Comment

            • War Room
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 9296
              • 2,806
              • 662
              • 19,006

              #26
              Originally posted by Sid-Knee

              You'd have to be deranged to think fair judging happens in the US. The US is the hotbed of corruption both historically and today.

              What Fury means by this, is when a British judge goes overseas and judges with a British fighter in the ring, they don't want to appear biased to the British fighter. But what actually ends up happening, is they end up with a card that is far too generous for the home fighter. This is why you get those cards from British refs towards British fighters when travelling.
              YDKSAB. Judges from wherever don't matter. You idiots think there is some nationialistic spirit that over-rides corruption. He's from x he wouldn't score for y, he's from x lmao. The fix happens with the Promoter and judges that will take an envelope of cash. They don't make shet. You simps are really irritating.

              Comment

              • VislorTurlough
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2019
                • 3276
                • 1,962
                • 34
                • 11,588

                #27
                Judging always suspect in countries with little brother syndrome and weirdo nationalism.

                Comment

                • Cool Scant
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 1114
                  • 109
                  • 37
                  • 27,271

                  #28
                  I was going to bet $100 wilder by decision. Damn shame can’t trust US judges concerning an American olympic bronze medalist and former world champion. SMH

                  Comment

                  • GrandpaBernard
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 17156
                    • 4,480
                    • 2,947
                    • 114,399

                    #29
                    I noticed Fury thinks higher of the US than he does the UK

                    Comment

                    • Sid-Knee
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2015
                      • 18249
                      • 1,091
                      • 731
                      • 155,532

                      #30
                      Originally posted by War Room

                      YDKSAB. Judges from wherever don't matter. You idiots think there is some nationialistic spirit that over-rides corruption. He's from x he wouldn't score for y, he's from x lmao. The fix happens with the Promoter and judges that will take an envelope of cash. They don't make shet. You simps are really irritating.
                      Fury is literally talking about the British judge who scored the first Wilder fight. Edwards.

                      And they do their cards for the reasons i pointed out. Not because they've been given an envelope full of money.

                      What do you mean, they don't make shet?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP