Tweet
Does it really annoy anyone else when people post their own scorecards to fights, as an example Cotto vs Clotty. All the time people are saying **** like yeah but i had Clotty winning the fight, he was ahead on my scorecards. Well i respect your opinion, maybe you did have a losing fighter ahead on your scorecard, but fact is no matter how far ahead you had them it means nothing because the other 3 judges didnt. Again Mallignaggi vs Diaz, a lot of people think Mallignaggi was robbed and maybe he was i didnt see the fight, I know the one judge was a total joke, but the fact of the matter is Diaz won the fight and it doesnt make **** of difference what you or I scored the fight because the history books say otherwise!! Everyone is entitled to there own opinion but at the end of the day using excuses like well i had him winning dont mean **** because he didnt win. sorry about the rant but its really annoying when people do this like there scorecard is the one that the world takes notice of.
-
-
Everybody's got an opinion.
But there were fights in history which were absolute robberies and the result of the judges doesn't even count sicne it was obviously wrong.
Diaz-Malignaggi was a 6-6 or 7-5 either way fight.I had it 7-5 Malignaggi but the 2 scorecards were just wrong.Comment
-
things like that will happen especially in a boxing forum
Comment
-
Dont get me wrong if people believe that the other fighter won then im not saying there wrong, what I mean is when they use it as an arguement like saying yeah but _________ is whatever because i had him winning the fight, yet the history books say otherwise. my point being in 10 years the record books will still say the same thing even if it was a robbery. We all know there has been some shocking decisions over the years,Comment
-
More annoying is your idiotic post. The whole reason there is a controversy in boxing is because it's on an OPINION based scoring system. There's few other sports that are on that type of system.
In football, baseball, tennis, golf, basketball etc you know who the winner is. It's about scoring, making baskets or scoring touchdowns. In boxing, there are many ways judges score fights, sometimes they see things we don't or vice versa.
So while it may be in the "history" books, doesn't mean it really happened. There have been many, many robberies in boxing and just because some group of men judged it a certain way doesn't mean it was right or should be accepted.
Saying Clottey beat Cotto or that DLH beat Trinidad or that Whitaker beat JCC isn't ****** or annoying. It's real boxing fans having real opinions based on what they saw.....Comment
-
So if Marquez or your favorite fighter gets robbed...I'll jus say well the 3 judges saw it in Floyd's favor and that's wat matters and aint **** u can do about it...Comment
-
people are entitled to their opinions no matter how ******ed they are.Comment
Comment