Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michelob Ultra arena & split proves who was ducking who.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    If everyone “lacks reading comprehension skills” after reading your posts, maybe your writing skills are the problem.

    It’s hard to comprehend the ramblings of a fool.

    Originally posted by kushking View Post

    Your reading comprehension is lacking, as you're mistaken for multiple reasons,I said: " 1st time a "p4p" champ is forced by Wbo to give #1 contender opponent 40%"

    So your examples make no sense whether you take what I said word for word,or whether you are combining my entire points as a whole.

    Because #1. Loma & Russell was for a vacant title,& Loma had just lost the same exact title to Salido the previous fight. And neither was p4p champ let alone super champ like Bud.

    #2 Bradley v Peterson, Bradley was nowhere near p4p,was not super champ like Bud,& Peterson was interim champ too.

    The point you Bud defenders are missing entirely is Bud is a p4p multiple weight Wbo champ with tons of defenses of that strap in multiple divisions,& Porter has no belt,is coming off multiple recent losses & hasn't been getting lions share of purses because hes been fighting killers & stars like Spence unlike Bud whos been getting most the purse every fight,yet the Wbo STILL found Bud to only be worth 20% more than Porter.

    Bud is not a draw deal with it

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by kushking View Post

      Your reading comprehension is lacking, as you're mistaken for multiple reasons,I said: " 1st time a "p4p" champ is forced by Wbo to give #1 contender opponent 40%"

      So your examples make no sense whether you take what I said word for word,or whether you are combining my entire points as a whole.

      Because #1. Loma & Russell was for a vacant title,& Loma had just lost the same exact title to Salido the previous fight. And neither was p4p champ let alone super champ like Bud.

      #2 Bradley v Peterson, Bradley was nowhere near p4p,was not super champ like Bud,& Peterson was interim champ too.

      The point you Bud defenders are missing entirely is Bud is a p4p multiple weight Wbo champ with tons of defenses of that strap in multiple divisions,& Porter has no belt,is coming off multiple recent losses & hasn't been getting lions share of purses because hes been fighting killers & stars like Spence unlike Bud whos been getting most the purse every fight,yet the Wbo STILL found Bud to only be worth 20% more than Porter.

      Bud is not a draw deal with it

      It's concerning that so many people don't understand.

      When you call a guy P4P, that raises the bar.

      It raises the bar for who they beat and how they beat them.

      It raises the bar for their expectation of asses in seats/sellout arenas.

      It raises the bar for mainstream casual appeal.


      Crawford has failed in each and every one of those criteria. But NSB keeps going back to this "he's P4P because of the 'eye test'" BS.

      Okay.

      Then against Porter, his 'eye test' has to pass, which means he has to completely dominate/shutout/knockout Shawn Porter with NO controversy. Because that's what P4P fighters do!



      What NSB keeps refusing to acknowledge, is just STOP CALLING HIM A P4P FIGHTER. You know he's not! Then this gets simple.

      Say he's just another fighter and you like his style. Great! That means it should be a close, competitive fight with Porter.


      It's like people here don't understand, the P4P moniker isn't just words. You're calling this guy the best. Okay, he'd better prove it against a real challenge. Which he hasn't fought until now, and let's be clear: he wouldn't have if the WBO hadn't forced him.


      "He only wants Spence!"

      He hasn't earned Spence AND you discredit Spence, so why does he want someone that you guys discredit? Why does that make any sense?

      You guys praise Vergil Ortiz yet celebrated when Crawford ducked him. Why?


      Because you are afraid of your guy taking an L.

      Comment


      • #13
        Errol Spence is ducking Vergil Ortiz.

        Originally posted by revelated View Post


        It's concerning that so many people don't understand.

        When you call a guy P4P, that raises the bar.

        It raises the bar for who they beat and how they beat them.

        It raises the bar for their expectation of asses in seats/sellout arenas.

        It raises the bar for mainstream casual appeal.


        Crawford has failed in each and every one of those criteria. But NSB keeps going back to this "he's P4P because of the 'eye test'" BS.

        Okay.

        Then against Porter, his 'eye test' has to pass, which means he has to completely dominate/shutout/knockout Shawn Porter with NO controversy. Because that's what P4P fighters do!



        What NSB keeps refusing to acknowledge, is just STOP CALLING HIM A P4P FIGHTER. You know he's not! Then this gets simple.

        Say he's just another fighter and you like his style. Great! That means it should be a close, competitive fight with Porter.


        It's like people here don't understand, the P4P moniker isn't just words. You're calling this guy the best. Okay, he'd better prove it against a real challenge. Which he hasn't fought until now, and let's be clear: he wouldn't have if the WBO hadn't forced him.


        "He only wants Spence!"

        He hasn't earned Spence AND you discredit Spence, so why does he want someone that you guys discredit? Why does that make any sense?

        You guys praise Vergil Ortiz yet celebrated when Crawford ducked him. Why?


        Because you are afraid of your guy taking an L.

        Comment


        • #14
          The insurmountable ******ity on behalf of the OP and his followers in this thread is unbelievable. What more should I have expected?
          ShaneMosleySr ShaneMosleySr likes this.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by MeanestNiceGuy View Post
            The insurmountable ******ity on behalf of the OP and his followers in this thread is unbelievable. What more should I have expected?
            Says the guy getting a thumbs up from the ******est most constant thread starter(says everything)

            Comment


            • #16
              He’s clearly an idiot because someone you don’t like clicked a button on his post.

              Originally posted by kushking View Post

              Says the guy getting a thumbs up from the ******est most constant thread starter(says everything)

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by kushking View Post

                Says the guy getting a thumbs up from the ******est most constant thread starter(says everything)
                Pathetic on your end but expected, nonetheless. I don't know you at all but something tells me I'd be wasting a lot of time trying to find out.

                And you go by "Kush King"...impressive. Immature but expected. There should really be an age limit to post around here....I wouldn't wanna waste this rainy Wednesday locking horns with the mighty Kush King.

                Allow me to bow out gracefully.

                My reputation can't afford to take a hit while trying to educate a clear village idiot.
                ShaneMosleySr ShaneMosleySr likes this.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP