Best of that Era?

[Roadblock]

Pac s unquestionably best of era. Most don't think Floyd is unbeaten not that there is anything wrong in losing. We want future superstars to lose as We want to see how you comeback, that's important you need light and shad e in a career.
We don't just want to see how you do when things are going well, we want to see how you do from coming back from loss whether you was robbed or you lost fair and square to make proper and accurate assessment.
We want triologies because the first fight is the beginning of story, 2nd fight is middle of story and 3rd fight is end of conclusion.

Manny is an easy beat with 8 loses Floyd would school all of Mannys other 7 losses, you're one of his simple-minded fans that's as dumb as a fence post.

[LeOoze]

Only pac fans think that somehow losing > winning

LOL

[Larry the boss]

why even try to argue..they have an excuse anytime the guy loses..let is go and let them have it

[The Big Dunn]

Pac s unquestionably best of era. Most don't think Floyd is unbeaten not that there is anything wrong in losing. We want future superstars to lose as We want to see how you comeback, that's important you need light and shad e in a career.
We don't just want to see how you do when things are going well, we want to see how you do from coming back from loss whether you was robbed or you lost fair and square to make proper and accurate assessment.
We want triologies because the first fight is the beginning of story, 2nd fight is middle of story and 3rd fight is end of conclusion.

This post is unbelievably ******. We want you to lose because coming back from losing is somehow better than never losing.

In what sport does beating every opponent count less than losing and coming back?

In what sport is losing rewarded more than winning?

[hugh grant]

This post is unbelievably ******. We want you to lose because coming back from losing is somehow better than never losing.

In what sport does beating every opponent count less than losing and coming back?

In what sport is losing rewarded more than winning?

Oh dear you deliberately choosing to ignore that people view unbeaten records with su****ion and in Floyd's case the su****ions would have been justified with his home advantage, cws, dodgy decisions not taking risks how people see it. etc etc
open your eyes embrace the idea everyone in sports loses, embrace idea Floyd's lost and imagine if floyd rematched Castillo or maidena with 1st fight decisions having gone against him, imagine how floyd would have faired in rematch. Unanswered questions and asteri x against floyd, it would impress me if floyd could ve won rematch if he's lost 1st fights. Winning rematch after gifts not so much.

[Roadblock]

Oh dear you deliberately choosing to ignore that people view unbeaten records with su****ion and in Floyd's case the su****ions would have been justified with his home advantage, cws, dodgy decisions not taking risks how people see it. etc etc
open your eyes embrace the idea everyone in sports loses, embrace idea Floyd's lost and imagine if floyd rematched Castillo or maidena with 1st fight decisions having gone against him, imagine how floyd would have faired in rematch. Unanswered questions and asteri x against floyd, it would impress me if floyd could ve won rematch if he's lost 1st fights. Winning rematch after gifts not so much.

You seem to talk for a lot of phantom people, it's so apparent that you are one of the simple-minded fans Manny anointed.

[The Big Dunn]

Oh dear you deliberately choosing to ignore that people view unbeaten records with su****ion and in Floyd's case the su****ions would have been justified with his home advantage, cws, dodgy decisions not taking risks how people see it. etc etc
open your eyes embrace the idea everyone in sports loses, embrace idea Floyd's lost and imagine if floyd rematched Castillo or maidena with 1st fight decisions having gone against him, imagine how floyd would have faired in rematch. Unanswered questions and asteri x against floyd, it would impress me if floyd could ve won rematch if he's lost 1st fights. Winning rematch after gifts not so much.

No they don’t. Only idiot Manny slurpers do because Manny has a huge number of losses and Floyd hasn’t lost. Stop projective you’re BA on to everyone.

Manny does the same CW’s and fights many of the same guys after Floyd did so are they less risky?

Floyd rematched both and won more convincingly so your point is dumb as f-ck.

You’re just a clown f-ckboy imbecile for even trying to argue this.

[El_Maldito_Rey]

[B][E];n31058425]hqdefault.jpg

Question for you?

If this was Floyd Mayweather in this picture, after 3 close fights with Juan Marquez.
If Manny Pacquiao UD Juan Marquez.

Then…
Manny Pacquiao UD Floyd Mayweather.

Would there be any question who is the best of that era?

it’s difficult to be true to yourself and Forget what really happened …

But Under these scenarios Manny Pacquiao should be the best agree?

Well when you cherry pick, duck and dodge every available opponent out there and fight an MMA fighter with zero boxing history, it's pretty easy to get to 50-0. Look at those 50-0, 60-0 foreigners that fight stiffs and compile a huge undefeated record.

[GrandpaBernard]

Floyd handled all of his rivals

manny got handled by his 2 main rivals

this is why Floyd is the best of his era