Comments Thread For: Roach on Mayweather's 50-0 Run: Pacquiao Had Better Quality of Wins

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Roach on Mayweather's 50-0 Run: Pacquiao Had Better Quality of Wins

    Freddie Roach, the head trainer of eight division world champion Manny Pacquiao, says his boxer is ready to put on a great performance on Saturday night, when he faces WBA welterweight champion Yordenis Ugas at the T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Roadblock
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 14031
    • 3,535
    • 428
    • 108,713

    #2
    Depends what you call quality as it goes along with handicapping the same guys Floyd beat without the handicap before Floyd beat you, but you would expect nothing less from Roach, he couldn't win a debate about it but he can make all the statements he wants to make.

    Comment

    • Fists_of_Fury
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 7366
      • 2,351
      • 12,608
      • 58,085

      #3
      Mayweather has better wins at 135lbs., 147lbs., and 154lbs. 130lb. Corrales would probably beat Morales and Barrera but I rank them better overall. Pacquiao fought a lot of guys coming off losses and after they looked like sheeit winning, quality doe. Pacquiao certainly has better quality losses to guys like Singsurat, Torrecampo, Morales, Bradley, Horn, Marquez and Mayweather.

      Comment

      • kingstip9
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2011
        • 2094
        • 488
        • 63
        • 32,854

        #4
        Originally posted by Roadblock
        Depends what you call quality as it goes along with handicapping the same guys Floyd beat without the handicap before Floyd beat you, but you would expect nothing less from Roach, he couldn't win a debate about it but he can make all the statements he wants to make.
        Whatabout pacquiaos run against the all time greats below lightweight. You know, pacquaio actually fought at a lower weight class than floyd.
        pacquiaos resume shts on Floyd.

        Comment

        • GypsyTRAIN
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Aug 2021
          • 282
          • 71
          • 329
          • 0

          #5
          Pointless to debate. Happy I watched both of them live. Both terrific in such different ways.

          Comment

          • hugh grant
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 30411
            • 2,180
            • 885
            • 105,596

            #6
            Pac s a higher AT G so whatever people think he achieved is obviously greater than what Floyd did

            Comment

            • Roadblock
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 14031
              • 3,535
              • 428
              • 108,713

              #7
              Originally posted by kingstip9

              Whatabout pacquiaos run against the all time greats below lightweight. You know, pacquaio actually fought at a lower weight class than floyd.
              pacquiaos resume shts on Floyd.
              We can debate if you like I bet it don't sht on Floyds, you do know how to read form going into fights right, weights timing wins loses going in etc, I think your just riding name value, I believe Floyd at 130 would beat Manny JMM Morales and Barrera one after the other.
              Doesnt matter if Manny started in a lower weight class , if they both end up in the same weight class within 4 pounds of each other from 130 to 154 what does that tell you ?

              Comment

              • Pac=Duran
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2015
                • 4886
                • 1,002
                • 585
                • 37,893

                #8
                It just straight truth.

                If you go your whole career undefeated then you obviously either fought in a weak era or else swerved a tonne of high quality opposition. Floyd was the King swerver.

                Looks at all his retirements etc. He's a legend but he ain't no Ray Robinson

                Comment

                • Roadblock
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 14031
                  • 3,535
                  • 428
                  • 108,713

                  #9
                  Originally posted by GypsyTRAIN
                  Pointless to debate. Happy I watched both of them live. Both terrific in such different ways.
                  Its simple Floyd is the better fighter, would beat Manny every day of the week and probably stop him as PBF around 130, all this who is greater is subjective opinion nothing more, when it really counted Floyd beat Manny in the ring, that's a fact and will always say Floyd is the better fighter.

                  Comment

                  • 3onethatruth
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Jan 2020
                    • 21
                    • 8
                    • 1
                    • 1,419

                    #10
                    Roach still mad Floyd beat Manny lol

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP