From a Neutral, Pac is gonna lose bad to Spence and it'll be sad to watch.

[Earl-Hickey]

In fact rather than a neutral I probably prefer Pacquiao as he's a legend who I respect tremendously.

But he's a 42 year old little guy and his PRIME was 10 years ago.

His contemparies are all gone and he's really the last holdout from his era.

Respect all he's done but Spence is bigger, a lot younger and is legit.

If Pac can win 2 or 3 rounds it will be an achievement, a win would pretty much tear the fabric of reality to me, prove its all a simulation and Pac would be like top 3 ATG and surpass mayweather.

[hugh grant]

Why Floyd's name need be mentioned? Yes, if PAC wins more will think he's goat than people already do believe. But it's hard to have e 2 special wins back to back

[pasawayako]

Trust me this fight will be easier than the thurman fight.

[Punch on Tap]

Trust me this fight will be easier than the thurman fight.

In what ways?

[hugh grant]

Trust me this fight will be easier than the thurman fight.

I hope your right but law of averages suggests Spence wins. PACs had about 40 very good to great wins and performances in 70 fights. Spence had about 9 in comparison. Surely it's Spence's turn. There's only so many great wins even higher echelon greats like PAC can have before great wins are fewer and further between. Great wins aren't an inexhaustible well. Surely spence is due his signature win, that will make people know him.