Should WBA ''Regular'' World Champions be classed as real world champions?

**larry x** · 09-04-2009, 06:46 PM

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...the wba should just be classed as ****** right with the rest of the santioning bodies

**Gettin Jiggy** · 09-04-2009, 06:50 PM

Originally posted by larrysmith

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...the wba should just be classed as ****** right with the rest of the santioning bodies

So in your mind then Vivan Harris, and Diosbelys Hurtado were never world champions?

**PittyPat** · 09-04-2009, 06:51 PM

Who the fuck is Paulus Moses? He's no champ.

**catalinul** · 09-04-2009, 06:53 PM

Normally nobody who ain't lineal shouldn't be classed as world champion but since we have sanctioning bodies that people still resort to yes they are champs.Even interim champs.

**AKATheMack** · 09-04-2009, 06:54 PM

**** the WBA with that dumb ****. Super, regular, super-regular,premium, unleaded. How about 1title and leave it the **** alone.

**MANGLER** · 09-04-2009, 06:57 PM

Originally posted by catalinul

Normally nobody who ain't lineal shouldn't be classed as world champion but since we have sanctioning bodies that people still resort to yes they are champs.Even interim champs.

Truth here. Nowadays, the WBA don't even reuire a champ to unify to become the super champ, they just do it as they please. Fuck the WBA, and all the rest of em too.

**Gettin Jiggy** · 09-04-2009, 07:00 PM

Originally posted by mangler

Truth here. Nowadays, the WBA don't even reuire a champ to unify to become the super champ, they just do it as they please. Fuck the WBA, and all the rest of em too.

but do you class the reg champ as a real champion?

Should WBA ''Regular'' World Champions be classed as real world champions?