weight class debate as it applies to legacy
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
ok scale down from 160 to 147 just to get a rep...you're not gonna get the same respect as a fighter who enters one division, stays there and fights his way to the top...Comment
-
Comment
-
lol you are obsessed with your hate!!
Hopkins turned pro at Light Heavyweight in 1988. He was fresh out of prison and had inproper training and very poor management. After losing his first fight, he got himself a new trainer, new management and he TRAINED FOR 2 YEARS before fighting again, because clearly he wasn't ready for the pros at that time, he needed to improve his game, eating habits, etc. He became fit.
You are an idiot and a man completely obsessed with hating on hopkins. In fact, have you ever commented on anything else? Everything you type is hopkins related.Comment
-
lol you are obsessed with your hate!!
Hopkins turned pro at Light Heavyweight in 1988. He was fresh out of prison and had inproper training and very poor management. After losing his first fight, he got himself a new trainer, new management and he TRAINED FOR 2 YEARS before fighting again, because clearly he wasn't ready for the pros at that time, he needed to improve his game, eating habits, etc. He became fit.
You are an idiot and a man completely obsessed with hating on hopkins. In fact, have you ever commented on anything else? Everything you type is hopkins related.
lol...president of the hopkins excuse maker fan club took the baitComment
-
Comment
-
no if you enter boxing at your most efficient weight and that is 160 and you lose early in your career, ok scaling down to 154, you should be say a little stronger than your opposition and have a slight size advantage...that imo isn't that big of a deal...but if you scale down two divisions to 147 and your a grossly big welter, feeding on smaller guys, ok you get your rep, but imo an asterisk should go by your name in comparison to your peers and atgs at those respective weightsComment
Comment