o Oh I don't think he was a bad boxer at all. He was very smart and tricky. I still think he was boring but definitely not bad. If his work rate were higher, I'd think he was a lot less boring honestly. He landed some really clever punches in there and knew how to get things done with little movement and the right punches.
What Makes a Fighter Boring?
Collapse
-
-
The perception of the viewer says whats boring, there is so much that is unseen by a large percentage of fans so the more basic and brutal it is the better the average guy can see it, ramp up the ability and things start getting missed, the sweet science is the hardest thing to master yet the least liked by casual fans.Comment
-
I appreciate the sweet science but break it into two parts: boxing and fighting. They are not the same.
If a boxer sacrifices the fighting part, he shouldn't expect to be appreciated same as the one who combines both. When boxers are not fighting, they are usually a bore. Compare someone like Andrade to Davis or William Zepeda. The first time I saw Zepeda was last week. He's amazing and exciting. He combines both spirits. I'm hooked as a new fan. He destroyed Tanajara's little baby mystique. William Zepeda is the definition of special effects.
I don't like watching a non-action fight.Last edited by BoxingIsGreat; 07-15-2021, 12:07 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
When I read that, Wlad came to mind, right away. I never really respected him much until the Joshua fight. He showed a big dog in that fight to make me forget all his past. He was on that night. Kudos to him.Comment
-
Comment
Comment