Famous decisions...were they fair

[Champoreeno]

Hagler totally won that fight against Leonard...that was a very bad decision.

That one is arguable, the worst was the draw they gave Leonard in his 2nd fight with Hearns.

[Run]

I don't believe any sane boxing fan would agree. But this is the same magazine that comes up with a new, bogus, P4P list every issue.

I totally agree. And since ive given out all my karma today.

That critique of Ring Magazine is worth the 500 im sending you.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[Imira]

So, we're in agreement on something else? The phony P4P ratings that "have the lifespan of a mayfly with health problems and suicidal tendencies."

[+= El Jefe=+]

RJJ in the Olympics
that was a robbery.

[Slipx]

dlh sturm-#1 lamest modern decision imo

[xrhythmxnxbluesx]

what about de la hoya and tito that was a robbery...

[wmute]

chavez-whitaker (pea, this is one is incredible, this is probably the worst decision I can think of)

hagler-leonard (leonard, it hurts to say that cos marv is my favorite fighter, but he fought such a dumb fight and conducted such dumb negotiations on ring, rounds and anything. Leonard is a ***** anyway for never giving the rematch)

marquez-pacman (pacman, I don't think he was robbed of anything but it is unconceivable that the fight was decided by an error!! if the judge who scored the 1st round 10-7 scored it 10-6 he would have won, and there is no way that the first round could have been any different from 10-6, "I thought we could not score 10-6 rounds")

louis-walcott (walcott, this is a really bad decision, saw this one on espn classics and it was the first time I saw louis fight, I thought "what's so special with this guy?" then I saw some more luckily)

dlh-tito (dlh, not the worst one but you have to look hard to find more 5 rounds for tito)

jones in the olympics

[Imira]

What kills me about the Louis v Walcott decision is that Louis KNEW he lost the fight and almost immediately stormed toward the locker room after the final bell. When the "winner" knows he shouldn't have "won", then that should tell you something.

[AintGottaClue]

chavez-whitaker (pea, this is one is incredible, this is probably the worst decision I can think of)

hagler-leonard (leonard, it hurts to say that cos marv is my favorite fighter, but he fought such a dumb fight and conducted such dumb negotiations on ring, rounds and anything. Leonard is a ***** anyway for never giving the rematch)

marquez-pacman (pacman, I don't think he was robbed of anything but it is unconceivable that the fight was decided by an error!! if the judge who scored the 1st round 10-7 scored it 10-6 he would have won, and there is no way that the first round could have been any different from 10-6, "I thought we could not score 10-6 rounds")

louis-walcott (walcott, this is a really bad decision, saw this one on espn classics and it was the first time I saw louis fight, I thought "what's so special with this guy?" then I saw some more luckily)

dlh-tito (dlh, not the worst one but you have to look hard to find more 5 rounds for tito)

jones in the olympics

judges are not aloud to score under a 10-7 round thats why pac didnt win its a rule so it isnt robbery

[Kimmy]

Worse verdict i ever saw what Sven Oktte`s 'win' over Robin Reid in their December 2003 world title match. Reid dominated Oktte and beat him up only for the judges to give the fight to the German by very wide margins!