Did Terrence Crawford bribed Boxrec?

[BigDramaShow!]

So as we all know Boxrec rates boxers by resumes. But somehow Terrence Crawford is listed with 1389 points. That’s 2x as much as Errol Spence despite Spence having the better wins and resumes

https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/447121

[Robbie Barrett]

A lot of those points will be when he became undisputed at 140. More points for beating title holders.

[ShaneMosleySr]

I don’t know why anyone pays any attention to BoxRec rankings.

[Robbie Barrett]

I don’t know why anyone pays any attention to BoxRec rankings.

In theory they should be the best, but they give too many points for beating B level guys and obviously count BS cards and robberies. For example. Lemieux and Brook are five star opponents for Golovkin, same rating as Canelo.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Computer rankings miss the most important component of rankings: logic.

In theory they should be the best, but they give too many points for beating B level guys and obviously count BS cards and robberies. For example. Lemieux and Brook are five star opponents for Golovkin, same rating as Canelo.

[Amir Imam]

924FABB7-F796-4C8F-AA47-7DF720FF931B.jpeg



I like BoxRec because they don’t rank off emotion or a fighters personal life .

[BigDramaShow!]

924FABB7-F796-4C8F-AA47-7DF720FF931B.jpeg



I like BoxRec because they don’t rank off emotion or a fighters personal life .

Currentlly Crawford is at 1389. Meaning boxrec he’s top 10 all time

[ShaneMosleySr]

Thats the dumbest list of all time greats I’ve ever seen.

924FABB7-F796-4C8F-AA47-7DF720FF931B.jpeg



I like BoxRec because they don’t rank off emotion or a fighters personal life .

[Amir Imam]

Currentlly Crawford is at 1389. Meaning boxrec he’s top 10 all time

Was that recently updated? I notice sometimes they make mistakes like that.

[blowblow]

bud is a bum.. i don't know why... he should be below the rank..