Shane or Pacman, who's the better all around boxer?!

**The_Italian** · 09-02-2009, 10:26 AM

are you saying boxer as in a fighter in the sport or are you referring to TECHNICALLY boxing?

if you are meaning who has better BOXING skills then its shane mosley. no question. he may be getting close to the end of his career but he's still an incredibly smart fighter with a ton of athletic ability.

**Rabbit ♠** · 09-02-2009, 10:33 AM

I hope that most understand the difference between fighter/boxer. Shane Mosely is a far better boxer. Only *******s would say otherwise. Now who would win between the two is open for much debate.

**TxHustla** · 09-02-2009, 10:38 AM

r u kidding me..shane!!! its not even a discussion.

**Jiddu Dali** · 09-02-2009, 10:41 AM

Originally posted by RepublicaEnemy1

Discuss...

Mosley without a doubt

but wait..are we talking Mosley on or off THE CLEAR?

**coup d'�tat** · 09-02-2009, 10:42 AM

Pacquiao couldn't KO Margarito.
He's too little.

But as for the question of the thread, it's Shane.

**madsweeney** · 09-02-2009, 10:54 AM

Boxing skills I'd go for Mosley.

It's odd to me, I see so many of threads like this and it seems most people don't think Pac has the best offense, defense, intelligence, speed, etc, etc. If he's such a mediocre fighter, why does he do so well?

Shane or Pacman, who's the better all around boxer?!