all of it is false.
Interesting. In one thread you argue all his fights are cherry-picked and he has no chance of losing.
them in another you argue people only pay to see him lose. Which leads to the question- why would people pay to see him lose, as you posted, if all of his opponents have no chance of winning?
what you really mean to say- and will not because it would force you to acknowledge Floyd’s greatness- is he has built a huge fan base because of his greatness while at the same time is polarizing.
Yea guys like you pay to see him lose but that is maybe 10% at best of the total.
frankly that just shows how f-cking dumb you are because -Shane is a perfect example for you- you let your hate for Floyd cloud your judgement as to how good he truly is.
As such, you believed he would lose. Maybe you should use your head and not your hate!
the Paul brothers see how they can exploit dumb asses, something floyd has done masterfully by getting guys that hate him to buy his fights.
Interesting. In one thread you argue all his fights are cherry-picked and he has no chance of losing.
them in another you argue people only pay to see him lose. Which leads to the question- why would people pay to see him lose, as you posted, if all of his opponents have no chance of winning?
what you really mean to say- and will not because it would force you to acknowledge Floyd’s greatness- is he has built a huge fan base because of his greatness while at the same time is polarizing.
Yea guys like you pay to see him lose but that is maybe 10% at best of the total.
frankly that just shows how f-cking dumb you are because -Shane is a perfect example for you- you let your hate for Floyd cloud your judgement as to how good he truly is.
As such, you believed he would lose. Maybe you should use your head and not your hate!
the Paul brothers see how they can exploit dumb asses, something floyd has done masterfully by getting guys that hate him to buy his fights.
Comment