Comments Thread For: Spence Opens As Significant Betting Favorite For Summer Showdown With Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • just the facts
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 13779
    • 2,433
    • 1,021
    • 88,113

    #31
    Originally posted by Patsfan bri
    Truth is Pac has no chance in this fight and truth is , truth Spence should be ashamed of himself for calling pac out when there are so many other real challenges and opponents he could face. Why fight a 42 yr old that you have every advantage on ? I’m convinced truth likes beating up smaller guys, hence Garcia .
    Why?? $$$$$$$$$$! How dumb are you? It's called prize fighting for a reason.

    Comment

    • Patsfan bri
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2015
      • 2268
      • 281
      • 153
      • 23,166

      #32
      Originally posted by just the facts

      Why?? $$$$$$$$$$! How dumb are you? It's called prize fighting for a reason.
      why what midget **** ? Why do I say pac has no chance or because I am questioning why he called out pac? Maybe you like prize fighting even though it doesn’t benefit you financially but I like fighting the best in your division to see who dares to be great and reign supreme. Furthermore get fook off this board if you are going to insult people who don’t agree with with you . This is a discussion board not 4th grade.

      Comment

      • Spoon23
        INVINCIBLE
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 20624
        • 922
        • 904
        • 107,969

        #33
        Originally posted by b morph
        If PAC wins, he has a claim for being the GOAT. Yes that’s right. Better than Ali and Sugar Ray Robinson. I don’t think you guys really understand how great he is. If he beats Spence and then beats Crawford, it’s a lock as GOAT, with no discussions about it. He separates himself from any other ATG in the history of the ring.
        Coming from you. That's honorable to recognize the truth. I respect that. Salute.

        Comment

        • just the facts
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2014
          • 13779
          • 2,433
          • 1,021
          • 88,113

          #34
          Originally posted by Patsfan bri
          why what midget **** ? Why do I say pac has no chance or because I am questioning why he called out pac? Maybe you like prize fighting even though it doesn’t benefit you financially but I like fighting the best in your division to see who dares to be great and reign supreme. Furthermore get fook off this board if you are going to insult people who don’t agree with with you . This is a discussion board not 4th grade.
          Dumb bytche, not one fighter throughout history has ever "dared to be great" without money being underlying factor in that fight being made. What are you a 3rd grader.

          Let's see how ****** you are, can you name one fighter within 140-154 that Spence would make more money fighting? I'll wait...........

          Comment

          • Patsfan bri
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2015
            • 2268
            • 281
            • 153
            • 23,166

            #35
            Originally posted by just the facts

            Dumb bytche, not one fighter throughout history has ever "dared to be great" without money being underlying factor in that fight being made. What are you a 3rd grader.

            Let's see how ****** you are, can you name one fighter within 140-154 that Spence would make more money fighting? I'll wait...........
            well of course they make money foook face but back in the day it wasn’t all about money. It’s donkeys like you that make fights all about money and that’s why we don’t see the best fighting the best, they price themselves out. To answer your question Crawford. He would make just as much money and if he were to win if would help cement his legacy. Besides fook the money. We would all rather see Spence/Crawford than Spence pac at this point. Now come up with something more intelligent than calling me a 3rd grader after I just asked if you were a 4th grader dumb dumb.

            Comment

            • just the facts
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 13779
              • 2,433
              • 1,021
              • 88,113

              #36
              Originally posted by Patsfan bri
              well of course they make money foook face but back in the day it wasn’t all about money. It’s donkeys like you that make fights all about money and that’s why we don’t see the best fighting the best, they price themselves out. To answer your question Crawford. He would make just as much money and if he were to win if would help cement his legacy. Besides fook the money. We would all rather see Spence/Crawford than Spence pac at this point. Now come up with something more intelligent than calling me a 3rd grader after I just asked if you were a 4th grader dumb dumb.
              When did one fighter ever chose a legacy fight over a money fight, ever? Stick that back in the day stuff in your a$$, I've been a serious boxing fan since before you were born.

              You actually believe that Spence would make as much or more money vs Crawford than Pac? I guess I asked how dumb you are, now I know......

              Comment

              • Patsfan bri
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2015
                • 2268
                • 281
                • 153
                • 23,166

                #37
                Originally posted by just the facts

                When did one fighter ever chose a legacy fight over a money fight, ever? Stick that back in the day stuff in your a$$, I've been a serious boxing fan since before you were born.

                You actually believe that Spence would make as much or more money vs Crawford than Pac? I guess I asked how dumb you are, now I know......
                Short strokes I didn’t say money doesn’t come with a legacy fight, I actually said money goes with it. All I said was back in the day fighters wanted to fight the best and it wasn’t all about money like it is today. Don’t you know ho to read? Nice come back by the way “ stick back in the day up your a$$”. How do you know Spence would make more fighting Crawford especially in a day and age where Saudi Arabia is putting money on the table for big fights ? Spence probably could make more because behind Aj/fury, Spence / Crawford is the next biggest fight in the sport. More boxing fans I’m sure , would prefer to see Spence fight Crawford not pac, hence why Spence has opened at more than 4-1. Done with you and your ignorance you internet tough guy who started with insults right out the gate.

                Comment

                • b Murphington
                  The JACK OFF guy!
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2011
                  • 7572
                  • 1,181
                  • 639
                  • 84,324

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Spoon23

                  Coming from you. That's honorable to recognize the truth. I respect that. Salute.
                  I never disliked Pac. I only thought that Floyd beat Pac head to head and I still do, but I recognize that Pac is better OVERALL in terms of greatness and legacy. I just believe that Floyd is a better boxer, but not necessarily greater than Pac.

                  Also at this point in their respective careers, Pac gets extra points in terms of career longevity, since he is still in legitimate bouts and his active career is still relevant. And that is very remarkable for someone with his style of boxing.

                  Comment

                  • Spoon23
                    INVINCIBLE
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 20624
                    • 922
                    • 904
                    • 107,969

                    #39
                    Originally posted by b morph

                    I never disliked Pac. I only thought that Floyd beat Pac head to head and I still do, but I recognize that Pac is better OVERALL in terms of greatness and legacy. I just believe that Floyd is a better boxer, but not necessarily greater than Pac.

                    Also at this point in their respective careers, Pac gets extra points in terms of career longevity, since he is still in legitimate bouts and his active career is still relevant. And that is very remarkable for someone with his style of boxing.
                    I can agree to that. Spoken like a true champ. Recognized. Cheers!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP