Which is the worst thing in boxing?!

**Pullcounter** · 09-01-2009, 12:25 PM

Originally posted by RepublicaEnemy1

Especially if the defeated boxer is too overrrated before the fight...

be more specific with your question.

**Junito-Rulez** · 09-01-2009, 12:26 PM

The worst thing in boxing is douche bags making ****** threads about "which is the worst thing in boxing?!"

**D-MiZe** · 09-01-2009, 12:27 PM

Originally posted by RepublicaEnemy1

Especially if the defeated boxer is too overrrated before the fight...

Hatton?

**keepthemhandsup** · 09-01-2009, 12:27 PM

poltics.....

**SugarSugar** · 09-01-2009, 12:29 PM

150 different weight classes and 30 different belts.

Should go to 8 or so divisions and 1 damn belt in each. Then the best IS the best and cant get a paper belt fighting bums

**Doctor_Tenma** · 09-01-2009, 12:31 PM

Depending on the beating the fighter is taking, he can quit.

**Pullcounter** · 09-01-2009, 12:40 PM

Originally posted by RepublicaEnemy1

Especially if the defeated boxer is too overrrated before the fight...

personally, I would rather get destroyed than quit, but if I did get destroyed, I would retire.

**bojangles1987** · 09-01-2009, 01:07 PM

Nothing ruins a fighter or says something about them like quitting, even if it was the right thing to do. Very few fighters ever get past that stigma when it is given to them. Just look at people's reaction to Nate Campbell right now, and Victor Ortiz.

Hell, even Roberto Duran, one of the 10 best fighters ever to live, never fully got rid of that label after his second fight with Leonard.

Which is the worst thing in boxing?!