So is it safe to say that Spence vs. Crawford is never going to happen?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PunchMeIDareYou
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 1534
    • 238
    • 505
    • 34,851

    #1

    So is it safe to say that Spence vs. Crawford is never going to happen?

    Bud just missed out on a golden opportunity to fight Pac, he's with a rival promoter, he'll probably fight Porter and then defend his title against a few more 'tuneups' in typical Top Rank fashion, and when it's all said and done the 'marination' for the fight (as the Bobfather likes to call it) will either (a). Not happen or (b). will be well past its expiration date ala Mayweather/Pac.
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #2
    Did you ever think it would? Al Haymon doesn't risk his title holders in fights with rival promoters. He wants to be boxings UFC with his own PBC belts, he needs the majority of the major orgs titles to make that happen. He took a risk with Wilder, so he could claim to have the "lineal" HW, that didn't turn out so great.

    Comment

    • Santa_
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2015
      • 14673
      • 1,417
      • 378
      • 143,233

      #3
      That was safe to say the last 8 times T-Bud extended his contract with the Bob Father.

      Comment

      • sicko
        The Truth Hurts
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2010
        • 34211
        • 2,594
        • 839
        • 151,307

        #4
        ...not while Bud is with Top Rank it won't

        Comment

        • KTFOKING
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2018
          • 14399
          • 1,266
          • 284
          • 344,781

          #5
          No, it can still happen. That's the fight TR would be fine putting on since they wouldn't be assuming all of the risk. That's why they were only fine with the fight taking place in the Middle East where they would have gotten a massive site deal. If you put Crawford vs Pacquiao stateside, then they are responsible for any potential loss on the fight. Trampler already said that if Spence/Pacquiao happens, PBC would be in charge of paying Spence and they would be responsible paying Crawford.

          This is also when Porter asked for the fight, they did not pursue it one bit since that's not a dual-PPV type of fight and it would be under TR's watch.

          Comment

          • War Room
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2014
            • 9296
            • 2,806
            • 662
            • 19,006

            #6
            Originally posted by PunchMeIDareYou
            Bud just missed out on a golden opportunity to fight Pac, he's with a rival promoter, he'll probably fight Porter and then defend his title against a few more 'tuneups' in typical Top Rank fashion, and when it's all said and done the 'marination' for the fight (as the Bobfather likes to call it) will either (a). Not happen or (b). will be well past its expiration date ala Mayweather/Pac.
            Why would you want it when we got --->

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP