Froch v Dirrell poll!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bhopreign
    Banned
    • Jun 2006
    • 11273
    • 419
    • 100
    • 12,036

    #11
    Originally posted by Infern0
    A message to all those people who say this will be a repeat of the Curtis Stevens BOREFEST

    Dirrel has a ONE INCH height advantage and no reach advantage over Froch.

    Against Stevens Dirrel had a SEVEN INCH height advantage and like a FOUR INCH reach advantage.

    Froch is not some welterweight sized midget who will run around unable to reach Dirrells chin, he will be right there, PLUS he hits harder, Plus he has a better jab, Plus hes probably faster than Stevens.

    If you think Froch is the same type opponent as Bloody stevens you need your head checking! Stevens lost by Ko to Marcos Primera!!!! (20-19)
    Reach advantage isnt really important, check for arm length.

    Comment

    • D-MiZe
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 25073
      • 1,061
      • 371
      • 75,542

      #12
      Froch hasn't fought anyone like Dirrell.

      Dirrell's only advantage is speed though and he's inexperienced. He needs to start off fast to stand any chance, but Dirrell won't slug with him. Instead he'll get on his bike and get away from Froch as fast as possible.

      Dirrell hasn't been 12 rounds yet either.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP