Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford Gets Split Decision in Initial Pre-Pac Fight Chatter

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Make the fight already.

    Comment


    • #22
      The baddest man at 147? Thanks Lyle I needed a good laugh this morning.

      Comment


      • #23
        Didn't realize this Was another Pacman D--k slobbing article when I clicked..........

        For the record Crawford would beat the dog walking s--t out of PacJuice. This article is a joke.
        #1PaperChamp #1PaperChamp likes this.

        Comment


        • #24
          Only One thing I will say:

          27 years old Pac mops the floor with 27 year old Crawford.

          It is so easy to pick on the elderly.
          Pennstate110 Pennstate110 likes this.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
            I don’t typically like fighters in their prime beating up on old fighters and would much rather see Crawford vs Spence. But I wouldn’t mind this fight happening because pac fans need to watch him get absolutely destroyed in order to have their delusion washed away. Crawford will end pacs career and hopefully some of the bozo pac fans will go away with him.
            I'd be pulling for Pacquaio but realistically he loses and most likely by KO. While I believe it would end his career it wouldn't end his legacy as that is already established.

            Comment


            • #26
              People act like science doesn't exist in athletics. Like over the last 20 years we haven't seen dozens of examples Why over the hill in the 80's90's is later stage prime now. I mean Foreman got a belt at 50, Bhop dominated till 49, they still rank pac better than 90% of the fighters under 40, I see no reason why a juiced up Pac-Man can't snack on Crawford.

              Comment


              • #27
                This isn't even passing the torch. Passing the torch was Manny/Floyd beating Oscar at 34-35. Cotto beating Shane at 36.

                Manny is 42 and retired. If Manny's team signs for this fight, then they don't care about Manny's health and just want another payday.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Unum-de-Uno View Post
                  People act like science doesn't exist in athletics. Like over the last 20 years we haven't seen dozens of examples Why over the hill in the 80's90's is later stage prime now. I mean Foreman got a belt at 50, Bhop dominated till 49, they still rank pac better than 90% of the fighters under 40, I see no reason why a juiced up Pac-Man can't snack on Crawford.
                  B Hop didn't dominate at 49. He picked beatable paper champions. When he fought Chad Dawson, Kovalev etc, he got schooled. If Manny wants to keep fighting, that's what he would have to do. Fight the Broners, Paulies of the world.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Not everyone gets sold on the "eye test." Plenty of hype jobs have been exposed when they fight their 1st elite fighter. Tons of prospects get exposed by veteran journeyman too.

                    Crawford had trouble with inactive and blown up Gamboa's speed and power while having a massive size advantage. Crawford got dropped by Eurobum Mean Machine. Crawford had his eye damn near closed shut from washed up and weight drained quitter Brook. Crawford had to lowblow washed up glass jaw Amir Khan to stop him. It's not hard to imagine Pacquiao beating him especially by stoppage.

                    If not for age and inactivity, Pacquiao would be a heavy favorite over such an unproven, overrated and over hyped fighter with such a trash resume. There's no question that a younger Pacquiao beats Crawford at any weight they both campaigned at. Only afrocentrics and Crawtards think otherwise. Pacquiao's D list opponents would be Crawford's A list .

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
                      Not everyone gets sold on the "eye test." Plenty of hype jobs have been exposed when they fight their 1st elite fighter. Tons of prospects get exposed by veteran journeyman too.

                      Crawford had trouble with inactive and blown up Gamboa's speed and power while having a massive size advantage. Crawford got dropped by Eurobum Mean Machine. Crawford had his eye damn near closed shut from washed up and weight drained quitter Brook. Crawford had to lowblow washed up glass jaw Amir Khan to stop him. It's not hard to imagine Pacquiao beating him especially by stoppage.

                      If not for age and inactivity, Pacquiao would be a heavy favorite over such an unproven, overrated and over hyped fighter with such a trash resume. There's no question that a younger Pacquiao beats Crawford at any weight they both campaigned at. Only afrocentrics and Crawtards think otherwise. Pacquiao's D list opponents would be Crawford's A list .
                      Not saying I disagree BUT Roach and Manny passed on Crawford years ago. That fight was in talks after the Floyd fight but never came to fruition. Manny fought Broner instead.

                      https://www.google.com/amp/s/larrybr...d/315058%3famp

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP