Why all the old thread bumpage?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stickman
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 3318
    • 160
    • 63
    • 9,835

    #1

    Why all the old thread bumpage?

    Is this Hirug guy just new, or being malicious?
  • The Phantom Menace
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 306
    • 14
    • 11
    • 6,613

    #2
    Originally posted by Stickman
    Is this Hirug guy just new, or being malicious?


    This has been going on lately, old threads from last year being bumped to the front. I don't think Hirug is the only one doing it though.

    Comment

    • leff
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 5141
      • 218
      • 108
      • 14,047

      #3
      no, he is not.

      But whats the point in bringing back the old threads???

      Some guy said today that he thought that VK would win over Willams
      LOL

      Comment

      • Marjoh
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Dec 2003
        • 583
        • 21
        • 0
        • 6,994

        #4
        It is kinda annoying. What happened to all the newest thread. And most of the reply are pointless.

        Comment

        • The Phantom Menace
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jan 2005
          • 306
          • 14
          • 11
          • 6,613

          #5
          Originally posted by Marjoh
          It is kinda annoying. What happened to all the newest thread. And most of the reply are pointless.



          When these guys bump the old threads to the front, thenew threads get pushed down to the back. That's why you don't see any new threads.

          Comment

          • mic573
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2004
            • 4646
            • 98
            • 14
            • 11,280

            #6
            They are just trying to get thier post count up by making dumb replies to old threads.

            Comment

            • !! Anorak
              • Feb 2026
              • 4,530
              • 10,898
              • 0

              #7
              ******. You only need 25 posts to download now anyway.

              Comment

              • mic573
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2004
                • 4646
                • 98
                • 14
                • 11,280

                #8
                Originally posted by Anorak
                ******. You only need 25 posts to download now anyway.
                First of all you need to check yourself before you go calling people ******. I don't ever step to anybody like that so I expect the same. I didn't say it was for the downloads I just said they won't to get thier post count up by replying with nonsense to old topics. If I remember correctly you were one of the ones doing it.

                Comment

                • !! Anorak
                  • Feb 2026
                  • 4,530
                  • 10,898
                  • 0

                  #9
                  Originally posted by mic573
                  First of all you need to check yourself before you go calling people ******. I don't ever step to anybody like that so I expect the same. I didn't say it was for the downloads I just said they won't to get thier post count up by replying with nonsense to old topics. If I remember correctly you were one of the ones doing it.
                  I think you've misread my post. I wasn't calling you ******, I was agreeing with you. The ****** bit was a comment on people doing it, not a derogatory name for you. I'd shortened it, as in "It is ******...."

                  As for the topic bumping, no, you're mistaken. Peace.

                  Comment

                  • mic573
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 4646
                    • 98
                    • 14
                    • 11,280

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Anorak
                    I think you've misread my post. I wasn't calling you ******, I was agreeing with you. The ****** bit was a comment on people doing it, not a derogatory name for you. I'd shortened it, as in "It is ******...."

                    As for the topic bumping, no, you're mistaken. Peace.
                    I apologize for making that mistake.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP