Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo: Andrade Can't Even Last 5, 6 Rounds With Me; This Pressure Is Different

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    [QUOTE=Senor_frogs;n30843513]
    Originally posted by rrayvez View Post

    fanboy I really don’t have the time to explain to you on the “why” of you’re 21 questions. Even if I did a fanboy like you would still ignore facts. Just like how you’re ignoring that you’re boy Charlo ducked Canelo. Even hearing it come from his own brother you still deny the fact Derev took less money to fight golovkin and you still deny the fact. So there is no reason for me to explain to you the “why”. Also he wasn’t the only one who petitioned to fight for the vacant wbc belt. But I don’t see you calling out the other champions who did. Again stop listening to those biased channels like boxing ego or Dantes boxing nation and akhai tv. Then maybe you won’t be such a LDBC shill. “rrayvez”, now I understand that explains a lot
    oh please. Everyone knows that what Canelo wants from the wbc he gets. They bent over backwards to just throw him their lame ass belt. I’ve never once listened to Dante’s boxing nation and don’t even know what ldbc means. I’m speaking the truth. But for you, I can already tell that you’re Mexican by your biased and blinded by love ways. But not a real Mexican. You’re a Mexican from either Cali or Texas who tries to overcompensate for not being a real Mexican by going super hard in your love of anything Mexican, in this case Canelo. Your user name is actually named after a non authentic Mexican restaurant created for people who don’t know better and think they’re getting an authentic Mexican experience. Ohh the irony. So spare me your excuses. If you want to love Canelo unconditionally despite the truth staring you in your face, that’s cool. I don’t really care. But don’t try to convince me otherwise because it’s clear as day what types of fighters Canelo passed on fighting and who he can’t wait to sign on to fight with. He love’s euros, old guys and guys who look bad or vulnerable in their previous fights. That’s when he’s ready to make fights happen.

    Comment


    • #72
      [QUOTE=rrayvez;n30843536]
      Originally posted by Senor_frogs View Post
      oh please. Everyone knows that what Canelo wants from the wbc he gets. They bent over backwards to just throw him their lame ass belt. I’ve never once listened to Dante’s boxing nation and don’t even know what ldbc means. I’m speaking the truth. But for you, I can already tell that you’re Mexican by your biased and blinded by love ways. But not a real Mexican. You’re a Mexican from either Cali or Texas who tries to overcompensate for not being a real Mexican by going super hard in your love of anything Mexican, in this case Canelo. Your user name is actually named after a non authentic Mexican restaurant created for people who don’t know better and think they’re getting an authentic Mexican experience. Ohh the irony. So spare me your excuses. If you want to love Canelo unconditionally despite the truth staring you in your face, that’s cool. I don’t really care. But don’t try to convince me otherwise because it’s clear as day what types of fighters Canelo passed on fighting and who he can’t wait to sign on to fight with. He love’s euros, old guys and guys who look bad or vulnerable in their previous fights. That’s when he’s ready to make fights happen.
      race baiting. I gotta call you out on your bias. And present facts weather the fighter be black white Mexican ,Asian or whatever other nationality it may be. While all you bring is you’re feelings to the table. Like I said before, “rrayvez” that explains a lot

      Comment


      • #73
        [QUOTE=Senor_frogs;n30843661]
        Originally posted by rrayvez View Post

        race baiting. I gotta call you out on your bias. And present facts weather the fighter be black white Mexican ,Asian or whatever other nationality it may be. While all you bring is you’re feelings to the table. Like I said before, “rrayvez” that explains a lot
        you’re the one who race baited by calling me bias, saying I must be listening to Dante’s boxing nation, and calling me a fan boy when there isn’t 1 single fighter that I’m defending in this debate. What I’m doing is stating the truth about Canelo and you got your panties in a bunch about it. If my criticism was of a non Mexican boxer, you wouldn’t have said anything. You’ve stated not one single fact while I have proven that Canelo took less money to face easier opposition. But you ignored those facts and came up with lies since you like to pretend to be Mexican and came running to canelos defense with weak excuses. So save your non authentic fake Mexican opinion for someone who buys into the nonsense.
        Last edited by rrayvez; 04-06-2021, 06:25 AM.

        Comment


        • #74
          [QUOTE=rrayvez;n30843825]
          Originally posted by Senor_frogs View Post
          you’re the one who race baited by calling me bias, saying I must be listening to Dante’s boxing nation, and calling me a fan boy when there isn’t 1 single fighter that I’m defending in this debate. What I’m doing is stating the truth about Canelo and you got your panties in a bunch about it. If my criticism was of a non Mexican boxer, you wouldn’t have said anything. You’ve stated not one single fact while I have proven that Canelo took less money to face easier opposition. But you ignored those facts and came up with lies since you like to pretend to be Mexican and came running to canelos defense with weak excuses. So save your non authentic fake Mexican opinion for someone who buys into the nonsense.
          What facts did you provide? your opinion is not facts. Again, “rrayvez”, that explains a lot

          Comment


          • #75
            [QUOTE=Senor_frogs;n30843931]
            Originally posted by rrayvez View Post

            What facts did you provide? your opinion is not facts. Again, “rrayvez”, that explains a lot
            rrayvez explains nothing to you goofball because it means nothing and has no significance. So the fact that you think it tells you something only further proves that you’re not very bright. Likely a borderline retarrrd. You, as a fake Mexican , naming yourself after a fake Mexican restaurant definitely says a lot. And the facts are, canelo took less money from dazn than what he was offered by pbc. Facts are that he handed over a belt when ggg was his mandatory and did the same when both charlo and Derveyenchenko were his mandatories. He also passed on fighting Andrade in 2019 to unify. But he was very willing to fight Yidilgrim once he was the mandatory and suddenly wants to unify when all he has to do is mainly fight euro fighters. I’m sure you’re ****** enough to thing those are coincidences.

            Comment


            • #76
              make the damn fight happen

              Comment


              • #77
                I se that as 50 -50 fight.

                Charlo is clearly not some killer, and Andrade is better than all guys he fought.

                Comment


                • #78
                  [QUOTE=rrayvez;n30844230]
                  Originally posted by Senor_frogs View Post
                  rrayvez explains nothing to you goofball because it means nothing and has no significance. So the fact that you think it tells you something only further proves that you’re not very bright. Likely a borderline retarrrd. You, as a fake Mexican , naming yourself after a fake Mexican restaurant definitely says a lot. And the facts are, canelo took less money from dazn than what he was offered by pbc. Facts are that he handed over a belt when ggg was his mandatory and did the same when both charlo and Derveyenchenko were his mandatories. He also passed on fighting Andrade in 2019 to unify. But he was very willing to fight Yidilgrim once he was the mandatory and suddenly wants to unify when all he has to do is mainly fight euro fighters. I’m sure you’re ****** enough to thing those are coincidences.
                  Again, I will not go into the “why” of things with you because even if I provide proof you’ll still deny it. Just how you believe Alvarez ducked Derev when it’s the proof is there in front of you that he took less money (500k less) to fight Golovkin over Alvarez. He chose the easiest road where it doesn’t end with him getting knocked out. Yet you still throw out your bias narrative about Alvarez ducking him And here’s why you’re a fanboy: you complain about Alvarez fighting his “mando” Yildrim and at the same time complain when he didn’t fight charlo when he was his “mondo”. You flip flop a lot so that it fits your narrative. And that’s a sign of a biased Fanboy. Again, “rrayvez”, that explains a lot
                  Last edited by Senor_frogs; 04-06-2021, 04:41 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    [QUOTE=Senor_frogs;n30844289]
                    Originally posted by rrayvez View Post

                    Again, I will not go into the “why” of things with you because even if I provide proof you’ll still deny it. Just how you believe Alvarez ducked Derev when it’s the proof is there in front of you that he took less money (500k less) to fight Golovkin over Alvarez. He chose the easiest road where it doesn’t end with him getting knocked out. Yet you still throw out your bias narrative about Alvarez ducking him And here’s why you’re a fanboy: you complain about Alvarez fighting his “mando” Yildrim and at the same time complain when he didn’t fight charlo when he was his “mondo”. You flip flop a lot so that it fits your narrative. And that’s a sign of a biased Fanboy. Again, “rrayvez”, that explains a lot
                    wow you’re really dumb. A fan boy is someone who defends a fighter they love despite there being facts that go against that fighter. You know, like defending someone who tested positive for banned substances but saying he’s not a cheater. Like defending someone who dropped 3 titles but saying, no they never passed on fighting specific fighters. Defending someone who took less money to fight lesser fighters but then lying and saying they didn’t take less money or pretending that it’s good business to take less money.
                    You don’t see the difference in canelo passing on 3 mandatories but then fighting the one who was by far the least risky? You’re too ****** to get it. He won’t face mandatories that are threats but quickly faces one who’s a 50-1 underdog. I won’t waste any more time on you as you’re way too inferior to make this interesting or worth my time. You’ve provided 0 facts and you haven’t successfully countered any of my facts. You just write nonsensical babble because you’re a fake Mexican who’s wants to deep throat an actual Mexican, but since that can’t happen and canelo doesn’t even know you exist, you show your unconditional love by defending his honor on boxing message boards like a weirdo stalker. In your creepy little heart, you think canelo appreciates your undying efforts. The best way to deal with an obsessed weirdo like you is to ignore your replies from this point forward so you can stew in your anger. So type away your responses, you’re on my ignore list from here on out and I won’t see them anyway.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      [QUOTE=rrayvez;n30844317]
                      Originally posted by Senor_frogs View Post
                      wow you’re really dumb. A fan boy is someone who defends a fighter they love despite there being facts that go against that fighter. You know, like defending someone who tested positive for banned substances but saying he’s not a cheater. Like defending someone who dropped 3 titles but saying, no they never passed on fighting specific fighters. Defending someone who took less money to fight lesser fighters but then lying and saying they didn’t take less money or pretending that it’s good business to take less money.
                      You don’t see the difference in canelo passing on 3 mandatories but then fighting the one who was by far the least risky? You’re too ****** to get it. He won’t face mandatories that are threats but quickly faces one who’s a 50-1 underdog. I won’t waste any more time on you as you’re way too inferior to make this interesting or worth my time. You’ve provided 0 facts and you haven’t successfully countered any of my facts. You just write nonsensical babble because you’re a fake Mexican who’s wants to deep throat an actual Mexican, but since that can’t happen and canelo doesn’t even know you exist, you show your unconditional love by defending his honor on boxing message boards like a weirdo stalker. In your creepy little heart, you think canelo appreciates your undying efforts. The best way to deal with an obsessed weirdo like you is to ignore your replies from this point forward so you can stew in your anger. So type away your responses, you’re on my ignore list from here on out and I won’t see them anyway.
                      Fanboy, don’t get mad because I call you out on your bias Again you provide no facts just your biased opinion and race baiting. Let me explain to you what I mean by “ “rrayvez” that explains a lot”. That means I’ve seen you post before. And never bothered to respond because just by reading them I can tell your a fanboy. And it’s a never ending story. You’ve been on my ignore list forever. But I made the mistake of not seen the name on your post before I responded to it. So I’ll say it one last time. “rrayvez”, that explains a lot
                      Last edited by Senor_frogs; 04-06-2021, 06:30 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP