Comments Thread For: Chocolatito On Suspension of Judge Carlos Sucre: Important Step Toward Justice Being Served

[breeto80]

I don't see the fight being as " one that could've gone either way " , as alot are saying. Are people that screwed up that they can't see who wins a round a who doesn't ? All this compubox crap is for the birds too. Who's ever operating this scam should be suspended. All I ever seen is these flakes never counting body shots which is absolutely criminal. Chocolito won that fight clearly. Did Estrada win some rounds ? Sure he did. But he definitely lost the majority of them. And I also know my opinion is in the majority .

[jdp28tx]

Once again Gonzales is showing his utter lack of class. Him whining and complaining has been a huge part of his career. He cries robbery in this fight just like he cried robbery when Srisaket Sor Rungvisai beat him up and destroyed his ego. He claims robbery against Estrada, but the truth is it was a very close fight. His hypocrisy knows no bounds since Estrada clearly beat him in the first fight by taking over the late rds 9-12. Estrada has a better argument for being robbed on the first fight than Gonzales does in the rematch. Gonzales has always been afraid of Estrada that is why it took him 8 years to give Estrada a rematch. While Estrada chased him and chased him and at the same time taking on the best opposition that 112 and 115 had to offer all the while the past few years Gonzales has been fighting very low tier opposition. And the only reason Gonzales fought Srisaket Sor Rungvisai is because he thought it was going to be an easy fight.

Estrada has proven to be the better fighter because he has been taking on the absolute best fighters in the division. He conquered Srisaket Sor Rungvisai and ko'd Cuadras while Gonzales has been facing a bunch of nobodies including the weakest champion, Yafai, at 115.

Gonzales, do everyone a favor and shut-up. Estrada is an honorable fighter and he has offered Gonzales an immediate rematch unlike Gonzales who refused Estrada a rematch, until 8 years later, when he had no choice but to fight Estrada again.

[just the facts]

Once again Gonzales is showing his utter lack of class. Him whining and complaining has been a huge part of his career. He cries robbery in this fight just like he cried robbery when Srisaket Sor Rungvisai beat him up and destroyed his ego. He claims robbery against Estrada, but the truth is it was a very close fight. His hypocrisy knows no bounds since Estrada clearly beat him in the first fight by taking over the late rds 9-12. Estrada has a better argument for being robbed on the first fight than Gonzales does in the rematch. Gonzales has always been afraid of Estrada that is why it took him 8 years to give Estrada a rematch. While Estrada chased him and chased him and at the same time taking on the best opposition that 112 and 115 had to offer all the while the past few years Gonzales has been fighting very low tier opposition. And the only reason Gonzales fought Srisaket Sor Rungvisai is because he thought it was going to be an easy fight.

Estrada has proven to be the better fighter because he has been taking on the absolute best fighters in the division. He conquered Srisaket Sor Rungvisai and ko'd Cuadras while Gonzales has been facing a bunch of nobodies including the weakest champion, Yafai, at 115.

Gonzales, do everyone a favor and shut-up. Estrada is an honorable fighter and he has offered Gonzales an immediate rematch unlike Gonzales who refused Estrada a rematch, until 8 years later, when he had no choice but to fight Estrada again.

So Gonzalez shouldn't be upset that he got blatantly robbed? GTFOH!

[P4Pdunny]

close fight but i did have gonzalez winning

[Sid-Knee]

Big respect for Choc but I would have to respectively disagree. It was a close fight, no robbery, obviously the judge was incompetent but there's is no injustice. And I would like to ask Choc, where was the call for justice in their first fight? If you watch that fight Estrada actually won and one judge during that fight actually had it worse than this judge with a score of 119-109. It seems Choc was ok with that card. Let's just keep it real, both close fights, the first Estrada probably won and Choc got the nod, Second Choc probably won and Estrada got the nod, so it's even, now let's do it again... War!

It is disturbing to read anyone having Gonzales losing the first fight as he clearly won 9/3 on my card. But then again, i know Mexicans and Mexican/Americans are the most extreme when it comes to scoring fights. The Mexican can lose every round and still have the nutters claim robbery. You're just used to all the corruption in your life that it's warped your reality. Desperation knows no bounds were you lot are concerned.

[Sid-Knee]

I don't care where there from Jab Jab Whimper. I'm from the Netherlands, I watch boxing because I enjoy the sport, and I watched both fights with the sound off and everyone is entitled to their opinion. What I want to know is why do you hate Mexicans so much? Are you racist? Just because you you're black doesn't mean you get a pass being racist, a racist is a racist no matter where you come from?

You are of Mexican decent and consider yourself as such, no matter where you were born. I've read enough posts of yours to see clearly your extreme bias towards Mexicans. So save the bullshlt because you're as believable as one of your scorecards.

[Sid-Knee]

Once again Gonzales is showing his utter lack of class. Him whining and complaining has been a huge part of his career. He cries robbery in this fight just like he cried robbery when Srisaket Sor Rungvisai beat him up and destroyed his ego. He claims robbery against Estrada, but the truth is it was a very close fight. His hypocrisy knows no bounds since Estrada clearly beat him in the first fight by taking over the late rds 9-12. Estrada has a better argument for being robbed on the first fight than Gonzales does in the rematch. Gonzales has always been afraid of Estrada that is why it took him 8 years to give Estrada a rematch. While Estrada chased him and chased him and at the same time taking on the best opposition that 112 and 115 had to offer all the while the past few years Gonzales has been fighting very low tier opposition. And the only reason Gonzales fought Srisaket Sor Rungvisai is because he thought it was going to be an easy fight.

Estrada has proven to be the better fighter because he has been taking on the absolute best fighters in the division. He conquered Srisaket Sor Rungvisai and ko'd Cuadras while Gonzales has been facing a bunch of nobodies including the weakest champion, Yafai, at 115.

Gonzales, do everyone a favor and shut-up. Estrada is an honorable fighter and he has offered Gonzales an immediate rematch unlike Gonzales who refused Estrada a rematch, until 8 years later, when he had no choice but to fight Estrada again.

You claim Gonzales shouldn't voice what is clear corruption against him by saying he should stop "Crying" and using the word "Hypocrite" without irony when you then go on to claim he "Clearly lost" the first fight when he did no such thing as it was a clear win for him in both fights against Estrada. That is unjust crying. But also shows arrogance because you're a hypocrite for doing so when you claimed Gonzales has no right to do so when it's his career that is being sabotaged here. You lose nothing. But Gonzales, who has dedicated his life to this sport, is unfairly ripped off by notorious crooks like you and loses an awful lot. I wonder what you'd have to say if your job or pay was sabotaged. That's even if you have a job.

Please, just stop with this nonsense. You're clearly delusional and don't know how to score a fight for shlt. It's criminal, just like it's criminal when these "Judges" attempt to score fights too.

You then claim laughably that Estrada is the better fighter and that Gonzales hasn't been fighting the best even though Gonzales fights the same fighters. That's deranged idiocy at it's finest. Estrada will never come close to the fighter Gonzales has proven to be. He's beaten Estrada twice clearly now, and once while past his best and the smaller man while Estrada is in his prime.

Now go away and please spare us from having to read such grotesque drivel.

[Nightprowler]

You claim Gonzales shouldn't voice what is clear corruption against him by saying he should stop "Crying" and using the word "Hypocrite" without irony when you then go on to claim he "Clearly lost" the first fight when he did no such thing as it was a clear win for him in both fights against Estrada. That is unjust crying. But also shows arrogance because you're a hypocrite for doing so when you claimed Gonzales has no right to do so when it's his career that is being sabotaged here. You lose nothing. But Gonzales, who has dedicated his life to this sport, is unfairly ripped off by notorious crooks like you and loses an awful lot. I wonder what you'd have to say if your job or pay was sabotaged. That's even if you have a job.

Please, just stop with this nonsense. You're clearly delusional and don't know how to score a fight for shlt. It's criminal, just like it's criminal when these "Judges" attempt to score fights too.

You then claim laughably that Estrada is the better fighter and that Gonzales hasn't been fighting the best even though Gonzales fights the same fighters. That's deranged idiocy at it's finest. Estrada will never come close to the fighter Gonzales has proven to be. He's beaten Estrada twice clearly now, and once while past his best and the smaller man while Estrada is in his prime.

Now go away and please spare us from having to read such grotesque drivel.

In one post you have whined, cried, and complained more than my own teenage daughter has in her entire life...what an embarrassment of a man you are lol

[Sid-Knee]

In one post you have whined, cried, and complained more than my own teenage daughter has in her entire life...what an embarrassment of a man you are lol

The embarrassment of a man is the one who has far too much arrogance to own up to their hypocrisy and showing a lack of irony because they're far too backwards and uneducated to understand how pathetic they clearly are. If you didn't like people supposedly "Crying" Why have you posted this? Why are you defending that idiot? Because you're a biased Mexican, that's why.

Good day to you.