Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: If Ortiz Passes Test With Hooker, I Wouldn't Mind Him Fighting Crawford

[Combat Talk Radio]

hold up, so just because he has the same trainer as Crawford, that means something in your eyes? I must be talking with a 13 year old who just now started watching boxing. So I guess guys that beat fighters trained by Freddie roach could’ve automatically beat pac too? Anyone who beat a fighter trained under the mayweathers could’ve beaten Floyd? That’s the logic of a retarrd. Even dumber is you thinking that because Ortiz was able to stop a C level guy like hooker, it means he can beat arguably the best fighter in the world ( no worse than top 3). You know what, I hope the fight gets made because simple fans like you who like to jump out the window and get all hyped like little girl groupies require a reality check sometimes. But my guess is, despite Oscar talking his usual coked up nonsense, he knows better and wouldn’t dare risk Ortiz taking a career altering beating the way Vargas did.

You straight up - again - ignored the part about Crawford getting two-pieced, wobbled and dropped by Kavaliauskas.

Which tells me you're definitely in denial and think that all of the fights where Crawford ate shots he shouldn't have from washed fighters were flukes, and don't realize that a young, hungry, prime fighter with knockout power connecting those same shots ends him.

Ok

[Jab jab boom]

You straight up - again - ignored the part about Crawford getting two-pieced, wobbled and dropped by Kavaliauskas.

Which tells me you're definitely in denial and think that all of the fights where Crawford ate shots he shouldn't have from washed fighters were flukes, and don't realize that a young, hungry, prime fighter with knockout power connecting those same shots ends him.

Ok

what you just admitted by not addressing your trainer theory that I just destroyed, is that you now acknowledge that your comment was absolutely ******. You should thank me for educating you but instead you choose to focus on your other theory about the “knockdown”, which was just as dumb if not dumber than the trainer theory, which is why I didn’t even address it. You saying he was “wobbled” is reaching. He essentially went through the same thing Floyd did when he fought zab. Got caught with a good shot while also off balanced, a knockdown wasn’t called and then he went right back to business and won in dominating fashion. Because zab caught floyd, does that mean that when he fought guys better than zab, that they were able to hurt him? Nope. So now you have a ****** trainer theory and and even dumber triangle theory blow up in your face, and you have now exposed you as a casual. What’s your next theory?? Let me tell you my theory about you, you’re Mexican American and are too biased to acknowledge common sense because you’re blinded by patriotic love which makes you look ridiculous in debates.

[Get em up]

Lipinets is no different than Mo' Hooker, yet he has been fighting @ 147 for much longer than Hooker. Lipinets is a great step-up fight!

Lipinets will make a better effort than Hooker did that's for sure. I wasnt overly impressed with his effort against Ortiz honestly. I do feel like Ortiz is there to get hit and the guy who continues to stand after he hits them will cause him alot of problems.

[Bronx2245]

Lipinets will make a better effort than Hooker did that's for sure. I wasnt overly impressed with his effort against Ortiz honestly. I do feel like Ortiz is there to get hit and the guy who continues to stand after he hits them will cause him alot of problems.

Lipinets' body structure is well suited fir 147. Hooker's body is not! Hooker has faster hands, less power, and Lipinets is the opposite!

[brown_knight06]

I was thinking the same thing out of the names at WW (Bud,Spence,Ugas,Thruman,Porter,DSG) the least dangerous but still a huge step up is Thurman ..

Thurman will test him and he will find out if his power is real against championship level fighters. Would like to see him against the idiot broner too.