The way Fury dominated Wilder and the reluctance of Hearn/Joshua to take the same fight says a lot, the bookies are very astute and with the destruction and complete dismantling by huge underdog and short obese Ruiz , this is all of course in the odds. Hearn talks ******ly about this 'maybe being the biggest fight of all time' (lol) ....It's for sure a interesting affair especially on a British level but it would be much more of a pick em fight had Joshua not have come apart at the seems. Joshua hits pretty hardso he has a punchers chance early but if a little Ruiz can dismantle Joshua like he did then a much bigger , more elusive and better Fury must be able to . It's only greed that's made this a 'two fight deal' and I suspect punters won't be anywhere near as keen on the rematch after seeing a one sided beating handed out by Fury.
Joshua definitely hits hard, but does he hit as hard as the bomb Wilder landed in round 12 of his first fight with Fury?
As he should be, based on the life and death battle AJ had with Wlad vs Fury's results. Also AJ quitting after being beaten senseless by a short fat boy.
Comment