Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone else think bjs is going to make canelo look amateurish?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

    Name all these times that Canelo won by robbery?
    Twice against ggg

    the judges cards were prefilled against mayweather

    Pretty sure they were filled out before the kovalev fight

    And the lara scoring was a disgrace

    The tit for tats he def has the judges on his side for more robberies in the future

    Oh yeah and the cotton fight was way closer than the judges had it

    It's truely disgraceful he may have won the majority but his opposition never have a fair shout
    eco1 eco1 likes this.

    Comment


    • #12
      BJS isn’t as slick as Mayweather or as powerful as GGG.

      easy work for Canelo

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Stuntman Mike View Post

        Twice against ggg

        the judges cards were prefilled against mayweather

        Pretty sure they were filled out before the kovalev fight

        And the lara scoring was a disgrace

        The tit for tats he def has the judges on his side for more robberies in the future

        Oh yeah and the cotton fight was way closer than the judges had it

        It's truely disgraceful he may have won the majority but his opposition never have a fair shout
        He didn't beat Mayweather so that was not a robbery.

        He knocked Kovalev the f*ck out. So that was not a robbery.

        He clearly was the better man against Cotto so that was not a robbery either.

        Essentially we're left with just Golovkin and Lara. Fights that were super close and could have gone either way. That's pretty weak.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

          He didn't beat Mayweather so that was not a robbery.

          He knocked Kovalev the f*ck out. So that was not a robbery.

          He clearly was the better man against Cotto so that was not a robbery either.

          Essentially we're left with just Golovkin and Lara. Fights that were super close and could have gone either way. That's pretty weak.
          You're not arguing that those guys wouldn't have got a fair shout though when it came to the judging it just makes rooting for canelo a guilty pleasure for you,you know this guy stacks all the odds including judges refs and whatever else in his favour prefight like some good ass tainted meat

          if anyone in the future beats canelo by say 1 round clearly they're not getting the decision the guys a crook

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

            He didn't beat Mayweather so that was not a robbery.

            He knocked Kovalev the f*ck out. So that was not a robbery.

            He clearly was the better man against Cotto so that was not a robbery either.

            Essentially we're left with just Golovkin and Lara. Fights that were super close and could have gone either way. That's pretty weak.
            Super close could have gone either way but majorly swayed into canelos favour and damn those cards took a while to get read out too

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Stuntman Mike View Post

              You're not arguing that those guys wouldn't have got a fair shout though when it came to the judging it just makes rooting for canelo a guilty pleasure for you,you know this guy stacks all the odds including judges refs and whatever else in his favour prefight like some good ass tainted meat

              if anyone in the future beats canelo by say 1 round clearly they're not getting the decision the guys a crook
              The claim was that Canelo had won by robbery "so many times." That was obviously false.

              Turns out we're only talking about Golovkin and Lara...in close fights where it's reasonable to say that the judges rendered the correct decision.

              Comment


              • #17
                No. BJS is a completely loser of a disgrace of a human who will not come to show up in the biggest night of his life. He'll take the payday and fight like a scared coward, Canelo knew what he was doing hand picking him to be his next opponent.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                  The claim was that Canelo had won by robbery "so many times." That was obviously false.

                  Turns out we're only talking about Golovkin and Lara...in close fights where it's reasonable to say that the judges rendered the correct decision.
                  When you consistently get scorecards like "119-109" in close competitive fights it's obvious the fix is in. I just don't believe it's a coincidence. If it had just been that one idiot judge who scored the trout fight like 10-2 for Canelo I would say it's a conincidence. But this happens every time Canelo faces a good challenge.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by ralex View Post
                    Canelo is leagues better than he was in the Lara fight.

                    ****** to look at that fight to predict this one.
                    And has better drugs and better bought judges! I am 100% agreeing with you.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo View Post

                      When you consistently get scorecards like "119-109" in close competitive fights it's obvious the fix is in. I just don't believe it's a coincidence. If it had just been that one idiot judge who scored the trout fight like 10-2 for Canelo I would say it's a conincidence. But this happens every time Canelo faces a good challenge.
                      The point is Canelo has not robbed people "many times." That is obviously bullcrap.

                      There have been super close fights against two guys, Golovkin and Lara. That's it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP