Originally posted by hollister
You ****ing idiot...
I said you were drugged because you implied, again, that I was the one saying he was drugged in the Brewster fight. Although I thought the fight was awful strange, I never said anything like that, this is just another one of your futile attempts at making me seem irrational in order to make your posts sound more reasonable, and don't even try that **** about name calling because you and I both know we've both been calling each other names since long before now, because that's the only thing you know how to do when someone makes valid points and calls you on your biased "observations" of fighters and fights. The only reason I even brought it up is because certain people had posted their negative opinions about simple name calling instead of any productive debating between the Klit haters and Huggers, if that's how you'd like to refer to them. I just wanted to at least bring it to people's attention that the Klit "huggers" are not the only ones to engage it that type of behavior, as you almost always resort to insults and name calling when you're challenged, and by the way, that's right, I said he gets panicky, because I have the balls to call it like I see it, the good and the bad alike. How many successful fighters throughout history have fought "scared"? At least I have a realistic idea of what most fighters are about, and if a fighter I like has a flaw, I acknowledge it. That's far more than you have ever done since I've been on this site. You are one of those people that think you have to "win" every arguement, and your definition of winning seems to simply be getting the last word in, whether it makes sense or not. You say that no one can have a civilized debate with me because I'll fly off the handle as soon as someone says he's less than great? Do you even really read my posts? Have you ever tried to debate anything with me without attacking me and calling me some ****** **** like "groupie"? No, the answer is you have never tried to, and most likely never will, because the truth is you're the one who can never accept any opinion other than your own, and I've stopped making points because you never even tried to respond to any of them, starting with the first one I ever made, it's a waste of my time to make valid points to you because you never try to debate me, you just start that ****** **** you always resort to. Look over my posts, with exception to the ones with you, Jabbie, and Boxing collector, and you will see that I interact with others and treat others with much more respect than you ever have. I just treat you bad because it's the only thing you understand, you don't appreciate respect, you seem to think you deserve it because of who you are, and since you're nobody to me, I disagree. I feel I've done my part as far as trying to discuss fights and fighters in a civil manner with everyone, and will continue to do so with everyone else. Like I said, if you ever made an effort to make valid points and focused a little less on trying to humiliate people, I might respect you more, but as it stands, the more you post that bull****, the more people are going to see that you don't even come here to talk about boxing, you come here looking for an arguement, because it makes you feel good when you can make someone else stop posting, and for Christ's sake, invest in a ****ing speak and spell!
I said you were drugged because you implied, again, that I was the one saying he was drugged in the Brewster fight. Although I thought the fight was awful strange, I never said anything like that, this is just another one of your futile attempts at making me seem irrational in order to make your posts sound more reasonable, and don't even try that **** about name calling because you and I both know we've both been calling each other names since long before now, because that's the only thing you know how to do when someone makes valid points and calls you on your biased "observations" of fighters and fights. The only reason I even brought it up is because certain people had posted their negative opinions about simple name calling instead of any productive debating between the Klit haters and Huggers, if that's how you'd like to refer to them. I just wanted to at least bring it to people's attention that the Klit "huggers" are not the only ones to engage it that type of behavior, as you almost always resort to insults and name calling when you're challenged, and by the way, that's right, I said he gets panicky, because I have the balls to call it like I see it, the good and the bad alike. How many successful fighters throughout history have fought "scared"? At least I have a realistic idea of what most fighters are about, and if a fighter I like has a flaw, I acknowledge it. That's far more than you have ever done since I've been on this site. You are one of those people that think you have to "win" every arguement, and your definition of winning seems to simply be getting the last word in, whether it makes sense or not. You say that no one can have a civilized debate with me because I'll fly off the handle as soon as someone says he's less than great? Do you even really read my posts? Have you ever tried to debate anything with me without attacking me and calling me some ****** **** like "groupie"? No, the answer is you have never tried to, and most likely never will, because the truth is you're the one who can never accept any opinion other than your own, and I've stopped making points because you never even tried to respond to any of them, starting with the first one I ever made, it's a waste of my time to make valid points to you because you never try to debate me, you just start that ****** **** you always resort to. Look over my posts, with exception to the ones with you, Jabbie, and Boxing collector, and you will see that I interact with others and treat others with much more respect than you ever have. I just treat you bad because it's the only thing you understand, you don't appreciate respect, you seem to think you deserve it because of who you are, and since you're nobody to me, I disagree. I feel I've done my part as far as trying to discuss fights and fighters in a civil manner with everyone, and will continue to do so with everyone else. Like I said, if you ever made an effort to make valid points and focused a little less on trying to humiliate people, I might respect you more, but as it stands, the more you post that bull****, the more people are going to see that you don't even come here to talk about boxing, you come here looking for an arguement, because it makes you feel good when you can make someone else stop posting, and for Christ's sake, invest in a ****ing speak and spell!
Comment