PBF or Pac? Whos Resume is Better?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FriendlyFire
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 88
    • 7
    • 1
    • 6,316

    #11
    floyd for real

    Comment

    • Jiddu Dali
      Banned
      • Aug 2009
      • 2938
      • 88
      • 62
      • 3,196

      #12
      Originally posted by Motofan
      Pac by days.

      lol@ by days....

      ok if u take away Berrera, Morrales, & Marquez (whom Mayweather is about to add to his resume) what other GOOD fighters are on Pac's resume?

      Comment

      • Horus
        Greatest Of My Era
        • Dec 2007
        • 10220
        • 772
        • 112
        • 18,146

        #13

        EVERYBODY in this thread Ask yourself a question.



        Why is it that when both Pacquiao and Mayweather was active nobody rated Pacquiao higher than Mayweather, if Pacquiao suppose to have the better resume?

        Dont you think People would have took note of this and had Manny Pacquiao
        ranked higher then Floyd Mayweather.
        in 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007, and 2008.

        Why in all these years did nobody ever say you know Floyd Mayweather,
        your #2 and Manny pacquiao is #1 ?

        Why?

        You why.

        Because stats and facts dont lie.
        the only reason pacquiao is #1 is because Mayweather retired.
        he never overtook Mayweather. he just filled a vacancy.
        huge difference.

        I dont see how somebody can say pacquiao is better than Mayweather.. when throughout their whole career nobody has ever rated Pacquiao ahead of Mayweather..

        throughout their whole career from beginning to end mayweather has fought better competition.
        Last edited by Horus; 08-26-2009, 07:18 PM.

        Comment

        • MANGLER
          Sex Tape Flop Artist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 30142
          • 1,705
          • 2,355
          • 46,598

          #14
          Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
          no no no..im not speaking on their past 2 fights...im speaking since they were bot 0-0 ....who has fought better fighters?
          I know homey. I was sayin nobody on here seems to wanna look past those fights. They do figure in for both guys, but not the be all end all. Pac's res is better.

          Comment

          • Jiddu Dali
            Banned
            • Aug 2009
            • 2938
            • 88
            • 62
            • 3,196

            #15
            [/QUOTE]the only reason pacquiao is #1 is because Mayweather retired.
            he never overtook Mayweather. he just filled a vacancy.
            huge difference
            .[/QUOTE]


            I was thinking the same thing.....and why do people think just cause he fought Berrera, Moralles, & Marquez that it trumps who Mayweather has fought....alot of these people are basically saying if Pac was 3-0 anmd his 3 fights were with the 3 i mentioned then he still would be an ATG's

            Comment

            • goldenglove2
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 2763
              • 54
              • 8
              • 8,954

              #16
              Originally posted by Horus

              EVERYBODY in this thread Ask yourself a question.



              Why is it that when both Pacquiao and Mayweather was active nobody rated Pacquiao higher than Mayweather, if Pacquiao suppose to have the better resume?

              Dont you think People would have took note of this and had Manny Pacquiao
              ranked higher then Floyd Mayweather.
              in 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007, and 2008.

              Why in all these years did nobody ever say you know Floyd Mayweather,
              your #2 and Manny pacquiao is #1 ?

              Why?

              You why.

              Because stats and facts dont lie.
              the only reason pacquiao is #1 is because Mayweather retired.
              he never overtook Mayweather. he just filled a vacancy.
              huge difference.

              I dont see how somebody can say pacquiao is better than Mayweather.. when throughout their whole career nobody has ever rated Pacquiao ahead of Mayweather..
              He has also destroyed Floyds last two opponents a heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeellllllllllllllllllllla lot quiker than Floyd did .....hence he is the better fighter P4P...

              Comment

              • goldenglove2
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 2763
                • 54
                • 8
                • 8,954

                #17
                the only reason pacquiao is #1 is because Mayweather retired.
                he never overtook Mayweather. he just filled a vacancy.
                huge difference
                .[/QUOTE]


                I was thinking the same thing.....and why do people think just cause he fought Berrera, Moralles, & Marquez that it trumps who Mayweather has fought....alot of these people are basically saying if Pac was 3-0 anmd his 3 fights were with the 3 i mentioned then he still would be an ATG's[/QUOTE]

                this is a very dumb post

                Comment

                • Jiddu Dali
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 2938
                  • 88
                  • 62
                  • 3,196

                  #18
                  Originally posted by mangler
                  I know homey. I was sayin nobody on here seems to wanna look past those fights. They do figure in for both guys, but not the be all end all. Pac's res is better.
                  ok now we're getting somewhere......ok how is his resume better?..cause of the Berrera, Morales & Marquez fights alone?

                  Comment

                  • KILLA RIGHT
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 8954
                    • 294
                    • 14
                    • 16,348

                    #19
                    pac has bigger names but they werent at there peak when he fought them so i got with money. Even though manny has a good resume as well

                    Comment

                    • Pullcounter
                      no guts no glory
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 42582
                      • 549
                      • 191
                      • 49,739

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
                      so ur saying just the Berrera, Morrales, & Marquez fights alone trumps the fighters Mayweather has fought?
                      yes

                      Cause beyond those 3..his record is padded with chumps
                      and floyd's resume is devoid of chumps?

                      Originally posted by Jiddu Dali
                      from top to bottom you think pac has faced better opposition...Berrera, Morrales, & Marquez ....and who else?
                      actually stopped dlh. stopped hatton before pbf.

                      You think Manny since his first pro fight has faced a more diverse list of opponents than Mayweather?
                      nope, but pac has better wins.

                      From where ive been sitting Manny has been facing he same style of fighters
                      jmm is typical mexican brawler?

                      mab typical mexican brawler when pac fought him?

                      morales a typical mexican brawler?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP