The cut was opened on a headbutt, but Campbell did quit. Anyway, Bradley would whoop Campbell in rematch just like he was doing the first time.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bradley and Campbell in Near Brawl After CSAC Hearing
Collapse
-
Originally posted by joseph5620 View PostHeadbutts are not legal in a boxing ring whether you like it or not.
Comment
-
im glad justice was served and the correct decision was made because i KNEW that ref was wrong. Campbell certainly knew it by the way he went about shouting his thoughts and anyone who would listen and i applaud him for it rather than taking the unfair decision and chalking it up to experience.
I only hope the diaz v. malignaggi situation gets overturned as well to a NC and make em do it again (at the least).
Campbell in my opinion would beat bradley anyway and i think its real chicken **** of bradley who say the replay say he didnt see anything wrong with the call. that was BS. He never once would admit anything. he just kept saying he won and its, "not his job to tell".
i hope they get a rematch soon. with all this extra jaw-******* it would make a good countdown show for a rematch? i think so.
Comment
-
I feel ripped off. The street confrontation sounds more exciting than what I saw on TV when they fought on Showtime.
Let them rematch already. At least we'll find out if Bradley really was gonna ace Campbell the rest of the way or if Nate was gonna take time, set up traps and get a win late.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View PostBoxingScene.com was advised that following their Monday hearing with the California State Athletic Commission in Downtown, Los Angeles, WBO junior welterweight champion Timothy Bradley and Nate Campbell were nearly involved in a non-sanctioned rematch on the street. [details]
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Italian View Postim glad justice was served and the correct decision was made because i KNEW that ref was wrong. Campbell certainly knew it by the way he went about shouting his thoughts and anyone who would listen and i applaud him for it rather than taking the unfair decision and chalking it up to experience.
I only hope the diaz v. malignaggi situation gets overturned as well to a NC and make em do it again (at the least).
Campbell in my opinion would beat bradley anyway and i think its real chicken **** of bradley who say the replay say he didnt see anything wrong with the call. that was BS. He never once would admit anything. he just kept saying he won and its, "not his job to tell".
i hope they get a rematch soon. with all this extra jaw-******* it would make a good countdown show for a rematch? i think so.
Comment
-
You can't quit on a big network in a mainevent fight for a world title and then keep bitching about not getting opportunities.
Bradley doesn't own him anything, no rematch. Let his old ass work his way up the rankings, then maybe he can have it.
What's to stop bigmouth Campbell from getting cut again and heading for the exit??? We now know his mentality, "if i'm cut I will ask for a stoppage asap and take the no contest and get paid doing so".
**** HIM. The only thing I see for Campbell's future is Malignaggie. How about that.
Comment
-
remember after the fight campbell said it was a hematoma that caused him to quit not a cut. now its the cut lol! my how our story has changed. of course the CSAC caved into political pressure instead of really investigating.
yes there was a headbutt but your job was to find out if campbell unjustly quit or he had serious damage to his eye. since the cut was a non factor and was not the reason the fight was stopped(campbell even admitted so) i don't understand how you can rule the cut caused the NC. incompetent!
Comment
Comment