If Paulie never left the northeast again would you blame him?

**Kevin Jesus** · 08-23-2009, 10:40 PM

If i was him i would never leave unless i'm really in need of money then whatever i'll take the risk. I hear Dibella is interested in putting him against Khan. If it's in the UK then that would be a decent pay check but also a big risk of a loss in similar fashion of Saturday's fight.

**Derranged** · 08-23-2009, 10:44 PM

Buttcrack McGhee

That fight was not a robbery.

But, if it will make everyone happy, just to be fair, the rematch should be held at MSG.

Even though I think it was a clear win for Diaz.

**Panchito** · 08-23-2009, 11:01 PM

I think everyone is going to stay away from Texas.

**Lokotron** · 08-23-2009, 11:10 PM

Originally posted by Spray_resistant

I know, I know another Paulie thread, but I just have to ask. Due to the blatant robbery last night where everything was against Paulie and he still outboxed Diaz, if he never left the northeastern part of the U.S again(NY, NJ, PA) would you blame him? It is kind of like Sturm how alot of ppl **** on him for never leaving Germany after the DLH fight, but I can't blame him as he came here once clearly won and got robbed. Putting myself in Paulie's shoes, I wouldn't leave home ever again after this because he is at a point where he can't afford too many losses. Even though the record isn't always a good measure of a fighters quality, every loss drastically decreases marketability and opportunities......So vote if you want make comments too.

I think if he gets robbed one more time hes going into retirment.

If Paulie never left the northeast again would you blame him?