Imo Malignaggi's punches were so... whast the word im looking for, well lets just say Max Kellerman had to let the audience know punches were landed on juan diaz while the punches landed by juan diaz needed no commentary bceause of hoe Malignaggi would react each time he was hit.
So I see the italians cant get a fair shake in texas
Collapse
-
-

Thats what I was thinking then I said uh oh they wouldnt score even worse on spite!? What a petty **** Van Hoy is.Comment
-
You mean Diaz’s punches needed no commentary because the audience cheered even if Diaz blocked a punch. I’m not saying Paulie didn’t connect with punches that would stop an opponent dead in his tracks, fact is, he was landing and even did so at a hire punch output then the volume puncher himself Juan Diaz. Paulie got a raw deal and he called it before the fight I just hope an immediate rematch would be implemented to clear up this Texas mishap.Imo Malignaggi's punches were so... whast the word im looking for, well lets just say Max Kellerman had to let the audience know punches were landed on juan diaz while the punches landed by juan diaz needed no commentary bceause of hoe Malignaggi would react each time he was hit.
Peace.Comment
-
how is that? i dont get it.Imo Malignaggi's punches were so... whast the word im looking for, well lets just say Max Kellerman had to let the audience know punches were landed on juan diaz while the punches landed by juan diaz needed no commentary bceause of hoe Malignaggi would react each time he was hit.
Diaz is always talked about in the boxing world as a "volume puncher" and "brawler" if thats the case why is the paulie attempted (AND LANDED) MORE (yes MORE) punches than the "volume puncher"????
and the fact is punches needed to be explained to the fans watching on tv because the fans of diaz (ie. damn near everyone in the building) would scream and cheer very loudly to punches that diaz missed with or that paulie blocked as if they landed. Giving the APPEARANCE than diaz was just taking it to him all 12 rounds when that clearly wasnt the case.
rewatch the fight and THEN come back and post.
the fight wasnt so clearly cut for diaz as you think it is.Comment
-
i was joking a bit about him being italian. i said that in the first page of the thread that i just posted it to get a couple extra views in my thread so my opinion would be heard but bet your ass if the fight took place closer to me i would have supported my fellow italian by going to the fight with a big huge italian flag.
however the fight took place in texas and i live in the SF bay area of cali. SOOOOO it wasnt close enough for me to go.Comment
-
how is that? i dont get it.
Diaz is always talked about in the boxing world as a "volume puncher" and "brawler" if thats the case why is the paulie attempted (AND LANDED) MORE (yes MORE) punches than the "volume puncher"????
and the fact is punches needed to be explained to the fans watching on tv because the fans of diaz (ie. damn near everyone in the building) would scream and cheer very loudly to punches that diaz missed with or that paulie blocked as if they landed. Giving the APPEARANCE than diaz was just taking it to him all 12 rounds when that clearly wasnt the case.
rewatch the fight and THEN come back and post.
the fight wasnt so clearly cut for diaz as you think it is.
Co-sign
Peace.Comment
-
So you counted all the punches Paulie whipped his head back to avoid?Imo Malignaggi's punches were so... whast the word im looking for, well lets just say Max Kellerman had to let the audience know punches were landed on juan diaz while the punches landed by juan diaz needed no commentary bceause of hoe Malignaggi would react each time he was hit.
Malinaggi took Diaz out of his game he didnt get to work much in close like he usually does. Paulie was landing more and throwing more.Comment
Comment