Jacobs-Smith, Guerrero, and Diaz-Malignaggi ROUND BY ROUND

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Santo Domingo
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 525
    • 27
    • 11
    • 628

    #41
    Ishe needs to feint, and let jacobs thro the right. Counter him hard

    Comment

    • Slotff
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2007
      • 2800
      • 124
      • 227
      • 9,078

      #42
      Nah, I'm not really blown away here at least with Jacobs. Granted, no one ever really looks great against Smith, but going off this, I'd pick Korobov to beat him.

      Comment

      • Santo Domingo
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 525
        • 27
        • 11
        • 628

        #43
        Jacobs belly...work that. When u get inside, rip the body.

        Comment

        • JmH Reborn
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 4874
          • 238
          • 127
          • 12,377

          #44
          Originally posted by swizz
          danny just won the seven but am i the only thats not impressed
          I'm not impressed...a bigger puncher may have taken him out by now

          Comment

          • -EX-
            Trading Block Tycoon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2006
            • 21258
            • 720
            • 689
            • 32,678

            #45
            I think Ishe took round 8...Danny jus looks sloppy....close fight

            Comment

            • swizz
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 2782
              • 100
              • 238
              • 9,312

              #46
              Originally posted by JmH Reborn
              I'm not impressed...a bigger puncher may have taken him out by now
              i agree 100%

              Comment

              • Santo Domingo
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Aug 2009
                • 525
                • 27
                • 11
                • 628

                #47
                8 rounds... likely 5-3 or 6-2 Jacobs

                Comment

                • Silencers
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 21957
                  • 505
                  • 235
                  • 32,983

                  #48
                  This is the type of fight a prospect needs. Both to know what he needs to work on to reach the top and to know that he can fight better opposition than the lower class of opposition that he has been fighter. Smith is a spoiler, always has been, always will be. Korobov wouldn't look good against this guy either.

                  Comment

                  • KILLA RIGHT
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 8954
                    • 294
                    • 14
                    • 16,348

                    #49
                    Originally posted by silencers
                    i have it 5-2 jacobs through 7. Smith needs an opponent who pushes him to make his fights entertaining. Anyways, smith is landing the better shots but getting outworked and outhustled pretty bad.

                    What did you guys expect anyways? Jacobs was bound to look bad against smith, who doesn't?
                    word.what u think of a julio vs jacobs fight i think that would be a good fight with julio pushing him

                    Comment

                    • Slotff
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 2800
                      • 124
                      • 227
                      • 9,078

                      #50
                      Agreed, 5-3 or 6-2 Jacobs

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP