Will Cotto lose credit for a Pac win if he weighs 160?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Talisayen
    Title User
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 13995
    • 5,216
    • 10,394
    • 976,564

    #21
    Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
    Hipocriisy at his best!!!!!

    You cant say pacquiao was a feather weight and Cotto a MW.

    Either Pacquiao is a WW fighting a MW or he s a LW fighting a WW, but yo cant have it both ways buddy!!!!!!!
    What I'm saying is, " a blown up featherweight will KTFO a (middleweight) Cotto come Nov. 14. The bigger they are, the harder they fall.

    Comment

    • Animalistic 3.0
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 580
      • 57
      • 22
      • 806

      #22
      Originally posted by mangler
      Everybody knows damn well goin in he's bigger than Pac. He won't get much credit anyway.
      Cotto will get lots of credit. It doesn't matter if you or someone else here wants to give it or not. The boxing world will give Cotto credit.

      Comment

      • borikua
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2004
        • 12530
        • 686
        • 745
        • 20,193

        #23
        Originally posted by PushLead
        Middleweights don't come in on fight night at 160 so whats your point.
        Exactly. Clottey looked like a big middleweight when he fought Cotto.

        Comment

        • Ch@mpBox@PR
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 21432
          • 432
          • 279
          • 22,261

          #24
          !

          Originally posted by Talisayen
          What I'm saying is, " a blown up featherweight will KTFO a (middleweight) Cotto come Nov. 14. The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
          Damn you are even more retaded than I thought.

          If pacquiao was a FW/LW because at the weight ins he weighted at the divisions limits then Cotto should be a WW for you.

          If you are using fight night weights then Pacquiao is a WW and not a featherweight!

          You cant say pacquiao was a SFW and then say Cotto is a middleweight, thats ******ed!!!!!!

          Comment

          • KingTito
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2006
            • 9391
            • 234
            • 350
            • 22,960

            #25
            No. He's the damn underdog anyway. People know Cotto is bigger.

            Comment

            • MANGLER
              Sex Tape Flop Artist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 30142
              • 1,705
              • 2,355
              • 46,598

              #26
              Originally posted by Animalistic 3.0
              Cotto will get lots of credit. It doesn't matter if you or someone else here wants to give it or not. The boxing world will give Cotto credit.
              Everybody is pickin against him homey. The bulk of em will just turn and **** on Pac before they give Cotto props. Just the way it goes most of the time. This is a no win situation for Cotto, excludin the $.

              Comment

              • 120
                Lords of BoxingScene
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 6264
                • 416
                • 799
                • 13,757

                #27
                Looking for excuses already?

                Comment

                • Talisayen
                  Title User
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 13995
                  • 5,216
                  • 10,394
                  • 976,564

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
                  Damn you are even more retaded than I thought.

                  If pacquiao was a FW/LW because at the weight ins he weighted at the divisions limits then Cotto should be a WW for you.

                  If you are using fight night weights then Pacquiao is a WW and not a featherweight!

                  You cant say pacquiao was a SFW and then say Cotto is a middleweight, thats ******ed!!!!!!
                  As I've said, Cotto's 10 - 12 weight advantage during fight night is irrelevant. Pacquiao will still KTFO Cotto in the 6th round.

                  Comment

                  • Animalistic 3.0
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 580
                    • 57
                    • 22
                    • 806

                    #29
                    Originally posted by mangler
                    Everybody is pickin against him homey. The bulk of em will just turn and **** on Pac before they give Cotto props. Just the way it goes most of the time. This is a no win situation for Cotto, excludin the $.

                    How is that? Cotto will beat Pacquiao and will be right in line for a fight with Mayweather (If he gets his balls back) and a rematch with Shane Mosley for The Ring belt. A Cotto win makes him the man in boxing. Cotto will call the shots after Nov 14.
                    Last edited by Animalistic 3.0; 08-22-2009, 12:33 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Ch@mpBox@PR
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 21432
                      • 432
                      • 279
                      • 22,261

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Talisayen
                      As I've said, Cotto's 10 - 12 weight advantage during fight night is irrelevant. Pacquiao will still KTFO Cotto in the 6th round.
                      Ok, thats fine and dandee, but why even bring it up, if is irrelevant to the outcome according to you?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP