If JMM beat mayweather, is he p4p number one?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VERDUGO
    We are Warriors!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2005
    • 4746
    • 249
    • 415
    • 13,930

    #11
    Originally posted by Dunkeroo23
    mayweather was not beaten either yet pac supposedly dethroned him, shouldnt mayweather be number 1 then according to that logic
    Mayweather retired and Pac been whooping asses including Floyd's last 2 opponents in a more impressive manner.
    That's how Pac got to the top.
    You think May can just come back out of retirement for 2 years and expect the boxing world to just give him the #1 spot again??
    Hell no!

    Pac will remain numero uno until he gets beaten or retires.

    Comment

    • Titing Kabayo
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 2971
      • 65
      • 26
      • 9,468

      #12
      Originally posted by vErDuGo
      Mayweather retired and Pac been whooping asses including Floyd's last 2 opponents in a more impressive manner.
      That's how Pac got to the top.
      You think May can just come back out of retirement for 2 years and expect the boxing world to just give him the #1 spot again??
      Hell no!

      Pac will remain numero uno until he gets beaten or retires.
      Well said... end of thread..

      Comment

      • Motofan
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 9098
        • 604
        • 1,921
        • 28,443

        #13
        Still Pac if he beats Cotto, but if Marquez somehow won and Pac loses then yeah Marquez would be number 1. Floyd is an amazing fighter, but he has been gone for a few years and beating him wouldnt mean as much as before.

        Comment

        • MoneyMay08
          Banned
          • Nov 2008
          • 87
          • 10
          • 0
          • 209

          #14
          Originally posted by Hard2kill
          It's between Pac and JMM... read and understand the thread amigo.. No one urgue about Mayweather being undefeated....
          maybe you should read what ur actually sayin. you said that pac could not be dethroned unless he was beaten. in that case mayweather should be number 1, according to YOUR logic. fact is, just cuz pac isnt beaten doesnt mean he cant be dethroned.

          and what difference does it make if you retire or simply dont fight. so if pac retires today and comes back tomorrow, he suddenly isnt number 1 and should be dropped from the rankings completely just because he "retired"?

          Comment

          • Idgas
            vas Normandy
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 3810
            • 111
            • 99
            • 10,583

            #15
            JMM can never be number one. he can only achieve to be numero uno.

            *ba dum tssh*

            Comment

            • Silencers
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 21957
              • 505
              • 235
              • 32,983

              #16
              It would still kinda belong to the guy that beat JMM and hasn't lost since.

              Comment

              • Titing Kabayo
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 2971
                • 65
                • 26
                • 9,468

                #17
                Originally posted by MoneyMay08
                maybe you should read what ur actually sayin. you said that pac could not be dethroned unless he was beaten. in that case mayweather should be number 1, according to YOUR logic. fact is, just cuz pac isnt beaten doesnt mean he cant be dethroned.

                and what difference does it make if you retire or simply dont fight. so if pac retires today and comes back tomorrow, he suddenly isnt number 1 and should be dropped from the rankings completely just because he "retired"?
                Beaten and retired are 2 different thngs but still the same... If pac will retired today, of course he will not be the P4p king anymore.. I don't see your point why you need to argue with me...

                Pac beaten = dethroned
                Pac retired = dethroned (and I am not saying that he still should be the p4p king even if he retired)

                Mayweather retired = dethroned

                So what do we need to argue about? You are making yourseld complicated...

                Comment

                • βetamax
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 3838
                  • 430
                  • 55
                  • 10,171

                  #18
                  I'm going to say yes. The P4P list is based on opinion and it's my opinion that JMM beat Pacquiao in the rematch and a Mayweather win would huge.

                  Comment

                  • shogunn
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 4553
                    • 168
                    • 6
                    • 11,224

                    #19
                    Originally posted by MoneyMay08
                    maybe you should read what ur actually sayin. you said that pac could not be dethroned unless he was beaten. in that case mayweather should be number 1, according to YOUR logic. fact is, just cuz pac isnt beaten doesnt mean he cant be dethroned.

                    and what difference does it make if you retire or simply dont fight. so if pac retires today and comes back tomorrow, he suddenly isnt number 1 and should be dropped from the rankings completely just because he "retired"?
                    big difference between 1 day and 2 years, how many fights have passed since mayweather retired?

                    The reason they drop is because everyone is fighting while he sits pretty doing nothing for 2 years, didnt defend his titles, etc. Many fights have occured since then and we should expect to just give him that title while other boxers like Manny, cotto, mosley, hopkins have been putting in work?

                    Comment

                    • FasTHarD
                      <div style=
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 14820
                      • 337
                      • 294
                      • 21,796

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Dunkeroo23
                      i think casa and diaz are more impressive than DLH and hatton. and beatin mayweather is more impressive than cotto. so i dont see why he shouldnt be
                      It's means bull****. Beating Pac makes him p4p no. 1 but if not. Sorry then. Old casa plus exposed Diaz better than Delahoya and Diaz? lol. Pac made them look like an idiot.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP