There is no robbery!!!

**syphillis** · 08-20-2009, 09:41 PM

It's a robbery if your favorite fighter didn't get the nod.

**Swoosh** · 08-20-2009, 09:56 PM

It's a robbery when corrupt judges are instructed to give the "favored fighter" a "10" if a round is "close". People are ****** to think that the only robberies in boxing are the obvious ones. Judging boxing is that of a human opinion and can easily be swayed by $$$$.

**Bababoey970** · 08-20-2009, 10:00 PM

So deos that mean that Castillo vs Mayweather (1st fight) wasnt a roberry??

**P.WILL** · 08-20-2009, 10:02 PM

oscar didnt lose to mosley the 2nd time

**XviciousX** · 08-20-2009, 10:11 PM

There is Pacquiao-Marquez II and then there is Casamayor-Santa Cruz. Two different types of controversial decisions.

**Tyson2k7** · 08-20-2009, 10:13 PM

Boxing has and will continue to have robberies. It's part of the sport, so just accept it and get over it.

**Primal Instinx** · 08-20-2009, 10:16 PM

Strike with Conviction or lose by Decision...always been the Motto of the outsider against homefield advantage.

**Fights** · 08-23-2009, 03:11 AM

Originally posted by Primal Instinx

Strike with Conviction or lose by Decision...always been the Motto of the outsider against homefield advantage.

Home advantage.

**-EX-** · 08-23-2009, 03:13 AM

Diaz-Malignaggi was not as close as Mayweather-Castillo...

Diaz ate so many jabs I lost count...

There is no robbery!!!