Am I the only one unconvinced with Pac @ 140?

**Shadow boxer 3** · 08-16-2009, 10:04 PM

Originally posted by mike ruler

Keep it civil here. I know making any thread about Pac will bring hate from some ppl. But, this is just my opinion here. I think there are a lot of more worthy opponents @ 140+ than Ricky Hatton, or Miguel Cotto. For example, I wouldn't mind seeing Bradley/Pacquiao. I think Bradley could give him a good run. what yall think? Plz no h8!! lol

hatton was the lineal champ at 140 and the other belt holders arent big names so we'll probley never see pac fight those guys. he just wants the big money fights now. and im not that impressed with bradley yet anyway

**mike ruler** · 08-16-2009, 10:06 PM

Originally posted by Shadow boxer 3

hatton was the lineal champ at 140 and the other belt holders arent big names so we'll probley never see pac fight those guys. he just wants the big money fights now

Yeah, that makes sense. Money trumps compelling fights yet again. How you think Bradley would do against him?

**El Angel** · 08-16-2009, 10:07 PM

Facing Bradley would prove alot and I would favor Pac, but Bradley doesn't bring the money, so I don't see it happening. He only wants big money bouts from this point on.

**Shadow boxer 3** · 08-16-2009, 10:07 PM

Originally posted by mike ruler

Yeah, that makes sense. Money trumps compelling fights yet again. How you think Bradley would do against him?

im not that impressed with bradley yet. he's strong and fast but so are alot of fighters.

**mike ruler** · 08-16-2009, 10:12 PM

Originally posted by Shadow boxer 3

im not that impressed with bradley yet. he's strong and fast but so are alot of fighters.

Sounds a lot like Pac. Since Bradley, is the naturally bigger man, I'd have the tendency to lean towards him.

Am I the only one unconvinced with Pac @ 140?