Will you be rooting for Vitali or Arreola?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Fantastic
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 19036
    • 527
    • 1,328
    • 20,027

    #11
    Originally posted by Hazard
    Why do people say it be better for boxing if Vitali lose? I do not understand this. Please explain to me.
    Because of a unification bout. The Klits won't fight each other.

    Comment

    • Madvillain
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 1080
      • 47
      • 18
      • 7,471

      #12
      Because people prefer an American heavyweight champion over anyone else. Complain all you want, that's just the way it is. An American champ means more casual fans from the US fanbase which means more viewers which means more money.

      Comment

      • Fulcrum29
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 4171
        • 171
        • 44
        • 4,430

        #13
        Originally posted by Hazard
        Why do people say it be better for boxing if Vitali lose? I do not understand this. Please explain to me.
        They're just saying that as an excuse to mask their true deep seeded hatred for the Klitschkos and white/European dominant boxers.

        A fat corpulent and obese slob that curses in every interview and refuses to run or train is NOT better for boxing than an articulate PHD degree'd handsome boxing professor that has the highest KO percentage in heavyweight history.

        Comment

        • VatoMulatto
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2003
          • 8168
          • 289
          • 218
          • 104,445

          #14
          I hope Arreola wins but the robot will most likely win.

          Comment

          • Mersey
            Dirt Nasty
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 9423
            • 619
            • 496
            • 18,766

            #15
            I think it's better for boxing, because there's no fun in knowing the result of a fight before it happens. With the Klitschko's, nobody can seem to beat them. So every fight you know who the winner is.

            I like to watch exciting fights that are 50/50. If Arreola won, there would be much more oppertunities for 50/50 fights to happen where anybody can win. If/When Vitali wins, theres nobody left to challenge him again (except Wlad).

            Comment

            • Mir-44
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 742
              • 82
              • 44
              • 7,190

              #16
              Originally posted by Merseysideblood
              I think it's better for boxing, because there's no fun in knowing the result of a fight before it happens. With the Klitschko's, nobody can seem to beat them. So every fight you know who the winner is.

              For me, I like to watch exciting fights that are 50/50. If Arreola won, there would be much more oppertunities for 50/50 fights to happen where anybody can win.
              Instead of the stronger men like Klitschko brothers lose bull**** fight to overweight fighter, would it not be easier for other fighter to train proper so that they can give true competition. Not eating so much food from burger king would be good beginning I think.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP