It's quite ****** to compile an "atg p4p list"

[kayjay]

You know what? You're right in a way!! I don't think you have to watch all the fights, but a large portion. That is why I stopped having like a ATG list.

The pretended precision of it is the worst thing. It's one thing to watch some grainy videos and wonder how Joe Walcott's defense would hold up against Roy Jones, another to try and say Jones is #28 and Walcott #32. The first is using your imagination to appreciate boxing, the latter is just nonsense.

[The Gambler1981]

Even if someone watched all the fights, how can you really seperate the best of the best.

Making a P4P list for current fighters is difficult enough and totally opinion driven that there is not true correct answer because P4P has no set definition, doing it for the whole history of the sport there are just so many factors and fighters to consider that it is pretty much a useless exercise.

[MELLY-MEL...]

The pretended precision of it is the worst thing. It's one thing to watch some grainy videos and wonder how Joe Walcott's defense would hold up against Roy Jones, another to try and say Jones is #28 and Walcott #32. The first is using your imagination to appreciate boxing, the latter is just nonsense.

i agree............good post.

[Pullcounter]

If you do this, you've either watched all the boxing matches that have taken place over the past two centuries, or you're a complete fucking idiot.

true, but its fun to do nonetheless

[BennyST]

kno what you mean ******... i call them sheepol


and you get ****ted on when you mention the current best atm with the old school boxers. either they are str8 up haters or have some ****ed up agenda

What the **** are you talking about? You're one of the worst you wanker! Every chance you get you bring up that Pac is without a doubt in the top ten P4P of all time. Sheepol is right.

[Chr0nic]

i dont have a p4p list all i know is that roy jones is top 30

[ThunderWolf]

Just wait for the PBF-JMM results.