Why would one not want to count a lineal title?
Which Boxers Won Belts at 3 Original Division?
Collapse
-
-
Actually Pac won the lineal 126 title from MAB because MAB beat Hamed who beat all the other strapholders and was clearly #1 without dispute.
At 130 Pac beat the top 3 in that division (the consensus best) besides Pac at 130 to win another ring belt.
At 140 he beat the lineal champ Hatton who beat the undisputed champ Tyszu.
I'd say 3 lineal titles is better than 2. Simple math really.Comment
-
****ing bunch of dumd asses in this thread. Firstly we have people saying paper belts mean **** then I come in here and Pac's greatest win for the lineal title over Barerra is being disregarded because it wasn't for some ****ty paper title.
Pull your head out of your arse whoever is trying to ignore Pac's dominant KO victory at 126.Comment
-
pacquiao was lineal at 112 as well.Actually Pac won the lineal 126 title from MAB because MAB beat Hamed who beat all the other strapholders and was clearly #1 without dispute.
At 130 Pac beat the top 3 in that division (the consensus best) besides Pac at 130 to win another ring belt.
At 140 he beat the lineal champ Hatton who beat the undisputed champ Tyszu.
I'd say 3 lineal titles is better than 2. Simple math really.
he beat sasakul who was considered by some as the lineal at 112. though not by ring.Comment
-
Comment
-
If we include the Barrera victory it would look like this for Pacquiao:
1st Title: 112 WBC Flyweight Title
2nd Title: 126 The Ring Featherweight Title
3rd title: 135 WBC Lightweight TitleComment
-
leonard shouldnt be included. making a Lt.HW fight at S.MW for his 175lb title makes no sense. i dont count it anyways.Comment
Comment