Which Boxers Won Belts at 3 Original Division?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • street bully
    Tua's daddy.
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 25014
    • 697
    • 263
    • 35,118

    #21
    Why would one not want to count a lineal title?

    Comment

    • Silencers
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 21957
      • 505
      • 235
      • 32,983

      #22
      Originally posted by Owlzfan84
      personally i think you have to count that. Barerra was clearly the man at featherweight.
      Then yes, Pacquiao should be included in the list.

      Comment

      • Mary Jane
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 1759
        • 195
        • 171
        • 2,121

        #23
        Floyd has won the lineal, Ring belt at 135 and 147. That's more lineal titles in original divisions than Pac. Floyd>Pac.

        Comment

        • lparm
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 6605
          • 353
          • 209
          • 63,788

          #24
          Originally posted by Mary Jane
          Floyd has won the lineal, Ring belt at 135 and 147. That's more lineal titles in original divisions than Pac. Floyd>Pac.
          Actually Pac won the lineal 126 title from MAB because MAB beat Hamed who beat all the other strapholders and was clearly #1 without dispute.

          At 130 Pac beat the top 3 in that division (the consensus best) besides Pac at 130 to win another ring belt.

          At 140 he beat the lineal champ Hatton who beat the undisputed champ Tyszu.

          I'd say 3 lineal titles is better than 2. Simple math really.

          Comment

          • Shattered Jaw
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 5131
            • 261
            • 141
            • 11,649

            #25
            ****ing bunch of dumd asses in this thread. Firstly we have people saying paper belts mean **** then I come in here and Pac's greatest win for the lineal title over Barerra is being disregarded because it wasn't for some ****ty paper title.

            Pull your head out of your arse whoever is trying to ignore Pac's dominant KO victory at 126.

            Comment

            • WhoreUs
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 15770
              • 556
              • 606
              • 20,363

              #26
              Originally posted by lparm
              Actually Pac won the lineal 126 title from MAB because MAB beat Hamed who beat all the other strapholders and was clearly #1 without dispute.

              At 130 Pac beat the top 3 in that division (the consensus best) besides Pac at 130 to win another ring belt.

              At 140 he beat the lineal champ Hatton who beat the undisputed champ Tyszu.

              I'd say 3 lineal titles is better than 2. Simple math really.
              pacquiao was lineal at 112 as well.

              he beat sasakul who was considered by some as the lineal at 112. though not by ring.

              Comment

              • Fights
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 1733
                • 83
                • 43
                • 2,016

                #27
                Originally posted by Mary Jane
                Floyd has won the lineal, Ring belt at 135 and 147. That's more lineal titles in original divisions than Pac. Floyd>Pac.
                Floyd is tied with Pacquiao with alphabelts in 2 of the original division.

                Floyd - Lightweight, Welterweight
                Manny - Flyweight, Lightweight

                Comment

                • Fights
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 1733
                  • 83
                  • 43
                  • 2,016

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Owlzfan84
                  personally i think you have to count that. Barerra was clearly the man at featherweight.
                  If we include the Barrera victory it would look like this for Pacquiao:

                  1st Title: 112 WBC Flyweight Title
                  2nd Title: 126 The Ring Featherweight Title
                  3rd title: 135 WBC Lightweight Title

                  Comment

                  • #1Assassin
                    Conveyor of Truth
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 8019
                    • 647
                    • 264
                    • 20,993

                    #29
                    leonard shouldnt be included. making a Lt.HW fight at S.MW for his 175lb title makes no sense. i dont count it anyways.

                    Comment

                    • Fights
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 1733
                      • 83
                      • 43
                      • 2,016

                      #30
                      Originally posted by street bully
                      Why would one not want to count a lineal title?
                      I only included the four Major organization (IBF, WBA, WBO, WBC) as recognized by International Boxing Hall of Fame.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP