Who are the biggest crybaby's??

[-MAKAVELLI-]

it has to be cotto stans;

-cotto doesnt get respect
-cotto should not have put up belt
-cotto should be able to weigh in at 147
-cotto is being a underdog, nobody is picking him to win
-cotto is being labled damaged goods
-cotto was cheated on by margarito
-cotto needs a trainer
-cotto needs to be left alone if he wants to do coke & sleep with many women & be a drunkard
-cotto is not tito
-cotto will be weight drained because of 1 pound
-freddie roach talks too much
-freddie is underestimating cotto
-i hate freddie roach(rob)
-i hate manny pacquiao
-i hate evangelista cotto
-why did evangelista have to throw a brick at cotto's new yaguar? thats just mean man. he just bought that mein! that's something a woman would do!

(ok, i made up that last one, but im pretty sure those thoughts crossed their minds)

i wish i could sig that list




true story

[Nuurzhaelan]

it has to be cotto stans;

-cotto doesnt get respect
-cotto should not have put up belt
-cotto should be able to weigh in at 147
-cotto is being a underdog, nobody is picking him to win
-cotto is being labled damaged goods
-cotto was cheated on by margarito
-cotto needs a trainer
-cotto needs to be left alone if he wants to do coke & sleep with many women & be a drunkard
-cotto is not tito
-cotto will be weight drained because of 1 pound
-freddie roach talks too much
-freddie is underestimating cotto
-i hate freddie roach(rob)
-i hate manny pacquiao
-i hate evangelista cotto
-why did evangelista have to throw a brick at cotto's new yaguar? thats just mean man. he just bought that mein! that's something a woman would do!

(ok, i made up that last one, but im pretty sure those thoughts crossed their minds)

The emboldened items are all I care about. I really don't give a hairy rat's ass what roach thinks of Cotto nor do I care what most others think of him. Furthermore, of the first two I emboldened, only ONE of those is a problem. If Pacquiao wanted the title, no catch weight. No title, catch weight is fine. So it's really only 2. What's the frigging problem with that?

[Talisayen]

The emboldened items are all I care about. I really don't give a hairy rat's ass what roach thinks of Cotto nor do I care what most others think of him. Furthermore, of the first two I emboldened, only ONE of those is a problem. If Pacquiao wanted the title, no catch weight. No title, catch weight is fine. So it's really only 2. What's the frigging problem with that?

The ****ing problem is the whining and bitchin'.

[Nuurzhaelan]

The ****ing problem is the whining and bitchin'.

And you're whining about perceived 'whining'. Ironic, ain't it?

[SlickRikki]

Justin Nozuka and his fans, crying for his and there Girlfriends ohh wrong thread




oh well

[RRICAN]

I cant believe a moron like you with significant learning difficulties can come with a word such a schmuck which truly pertains to crybabies like you.

By the way, there would be no shame for a blown up featherweight to lose a fight with a big welterweight. The problem is if a big welterweight will get KTFO by a midget.

You just put yourself as the #5 P4P whiner of this site.

****, already started with the excuses ??????

[Pullcounter]

The emboldened items are all I care about. I really don't give a hairy rat's ass what roach thinks of Cotto nor do I care what most others think of him. Furthermore, of the first two I emboldened, only ONE of those is a problem. If Pacquiao wanted the title, no catch weight. No title, catch weight is fine. So it's really only 2. What's the frigging problem with that?

lol, complaining in a thread about complainers. ironic?

[The Hammer]

David Haye fans.

"The contract wasn't FAIR that's why David pretended he injured his back"

[Pullcounter]

****, already started with the excuses ??????

there is no shame for a smaller boxer to lose to a bigger boxer. the bigger boxer is supposed to win. the only shame for the smaller boxer is that he looks ****** for signing to fight someone that outweighs him by 10+ lbs.

[S.G.]

there is no shame for a smaller boxer to lose to a bigger boxer. the bigger boxer is supposed to win. the only shame for the smaller boxer is that he looks ****** for signing to fight someone that outweighs him by 10+ lbs.

you're underestimating (a.) just how good Pacquiao is and (b.) the fact that the weight disparity come fight night will not be so much greater than some you find in bouts between boxers who supposedly weigh the same