carl froch is alot more skillful than you lot think

[Stercus Accidit]

thats a oor anaysis.

Dirrell was illegally ducking his head, watch the bigragu yotubr assessment 0f the fight(hes american asnd scored 2 rounds to froch). He discussed dirrells illegal ducking.

When you duck you do not show the back of your head, dirrell kept showing the back of your head, deliberately to stink the place out. Luckily froch is a beast and just kept hitting what dirrell showed(the back of his head).

As for dirrell landing the better punches, thats baloney, dirrell got cloked in the 3, and 8 round by the best shots.

For all his running, his face was bleeding and froch was unscathed.


Dirrells best round was round 10 and rightfully was deducted a point for holding, so his best round wa a draw.

Dirrell in the interview after admitted froch won round 12.


If you thyink dirrell won that fight, you should not be involved with boxing, please dont post again.

Not be involved with boxing? How old are you?

[slimshandy69]

Not be involved with boxing? How old are you?

leave it mate, ive out debated you, is one thing you think froch lost, but to say hes lucky despite the fact that even if you replaced froch with the press row, he wouold have won by unanim ous decision.

The fact that all the top experts think he won, yet you, some loner in a council house opinion overides everyone elses, whihc equates to froch being lucky???

As i say i suggest you leave this forum and the boxing cumminity altogather until you actually use logic.

[Rome-By-Ko]

This guy has to be a troll.

And your a moron if ya think Froch(if he beats Ward)is not on his way to greatness..

[Stercus Accidit]

leave it mate, ive out debated you, is one thing you think froch lost, but to say hes lucky despite the fact that even if you replaced froch with the press row, he wouold have won by unanim ous decision.

The fact that all the top experts think he won, yet you, some loner in a council house opinion overides everyone elses, whihc equates to froch being lucky???

As i say i suggest you leave this forum and the boxing cumminity altogather until you actually use logic.

Your the perfect example of someone who only watches one person in a fight.
Froch was outboxed by miles and the only thing that made it 'close' was the fact that Dirrell was holding was so much which made him seem negative,
when he wasn't slipping punches and landing on Froch that is.

Just because you probably live in a rat infested 1 bedroom council ****ehole doesn't mean everybody does mate, grow up and learn some manners.

He got hit more, was outslicked and his face at the end of the fight said it all, you know, I know and the rat with aids under your bed knows, he thought he was done for.

All you keep going on about is the experts said this, the experts said that, use your own opinions, its not that hard. And look at his face, compared with his face etc etc etc.

Watch the fight again, clean your very small dirty room and come back when you are sober.

[slimshandy69]

He got hit more, was outslicked and his face at the end of the fight said it all, you know, I know and the rat with aids under your bed knows, he thought he was done for.

.

If dirrell wasnt slipping punches he was slipping over, ev erytime froch was about to behead the guy, he was either on his arse, running, illegally ducking or excessive holding.

But even with all that froch out landed dirrell as shown by the punch stats..

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578

Dirrell was deducted one point in the tenth round for excessive holding.
Blows: Froch 153/475 32%; Dirrell 105/315 33%.

[Stercus Accidit]

If dirrell wasnt slipping punches he was slipping over, ev erytime froch was about to behead the guy, he was either on his arse, running, illegally ducking or excessive holding.

But even with all that froch out landed dirrell as shown by the punch stats..

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578

Dirrell was deducted one point in the tenth round for excessive holding.
Blows: Froch 153/475 32%; Dirrell 105/315 33%.

Again with numbers and stats, I call a fight on what I see. The better quality shots were with Dirrell. The better defense was with Dirrell. The better foot work was with Dirrell. The better hustle was with Dirrell.

Numbers, percentages and judges rarely tell a true tale in boxing.

[Prince Mongo]

Froch has a lot of skill and uses distance well. His style is pure Jack Sharkey. It is not pretty but very effective. I am not sure he is good enough to get past Ward though. I see ward winning on points.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Your the perfect example of someone who only watches one person in a fight.
Froch was outboxed by miles and the only thing that made it 'close' was the fact that Dirrell was holding was so much which made him seem negative,
when he wasn't slipping punches and landing on Froch that is.

Just because you probably live in a rat infested 1 bedroom council ****ehole doesn't mean everybody does mate, grow up and learn some manners.

He got hit more, was outslicked and his face at the end of the fight said it all, you know, I know and the rat with aids under your bed knows, he thought he was done for.

All you keep going on about is the experts said this, the experts said that, use your own opinions, its not that hard. And look at his face, compared with his face etc etc etc.

Watch the fight again, clean your very small dirty room and come back when you are sober.

I've watch this fight a few times and every time I see Froch winning it..Not so much because of what he did in the ring,but what Dirrell did in the ring..

You have effective boxing and then you have flat out avoiding..Dirrell avoided Froch and did everthing in his power to not engage..I don't believe Froch was lucky,I believe Dirrell lost the fight for himself end of story..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Again with numbers and stats, I call a fight on what I see. The better quality shots were with Dirrell. The better defense was with Dirrell. The better foot work was with Dirrell. The better hustle was with Dirrell.

Numbers, percentages and judges rarely tell a true tale in boxing.

The more effective punches came from Froch early in the fight imo..Busted Dirrell's nose open he did not stop bleeding all night..I would not call what Dirrell did footwork,it was running flat out..He did not use his feet to set up shots..He used his feet to get away..IMO hustle was a slight edge to Froch being the fact he chased Dirrell all night..

[slimshandy69]

The more effective punches came from Froch early in the fight imo..Busted Dirrell's nose open he did not stop bleeding all night..I would not call what Dirrell did footwork,it was running flat out..He did not use his feet to set up shots..He used his feet to get away..IMO hustle was a slight edge to Froch being the fact he chased Dirrell all night..

mate the guys going mental and is a lost cause.

He thinks falling over, illegal ducking, holding and running is part of boxing.

Hnece why i told him to leave the boxing community because hes a terrible poster, with probably a terrible social life.

God help his soul....